The Lack of a Glucose Peak During the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test in Pregnancy: What Does It Portend for Perinatal Outcomes?

<b>Background</b>: An univocal definition for a lack of glucose peak during the oral glucose tolerance test in pregnancy (flat curve) has never been agreed upon. Thus, the aim of this study was to provide a definition for the flat 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and to assess its clinical significance. <b>Methods</b>: A retrospective cohort study, where 8.810 pregnant singleton women were evaluated at the time of a 75 g OGTT between 24<sup>0</sup> and 28<sup>6</sup> weeks for the universal screening of gestational diabetes (GDM). The 75 g OGTT was considered flat when the difference between peak and fasting glucose concentrations was ≤30 mg/dL. A total of 953 (10.8%) women were diagnosed as having GDM, while 7.857 (89.2%) had normal glucose tolerance (NGT); 2791 women with normal glucose tolerance (35.5%) had a FLAT curve and 5066 (64.5%) had a concentration difference > 30 mg/dL (NGT). In all groups, we evaluated maternal characteristics and perinatal outcome. <b>Results</b>: Women with a FLAT curve were younger, taller, thinner, and their pre-pregnancy body mass index was lower than the other groups (all <i>p</i> < 0.001). The rate of obesity was also lower (<i>p</i> < 0.01). The vaginal delivery rate was higher than in NGT (80.4% vs. 77.8%; <i>p</i> < 0.01) and women with GDM (73.0%; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and that of primary cesarean lower than in NGT (11.9% vs. 14.8%; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and women with GDM (18.2%; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Between women with a FLAT and NGT OGTT curve, there was no significant difference for birthweight < 10th percentile (6.9% vs. 6.2%; <i>p</i> = 0.2), though the proportion of birthweight > 90th was lower (8% vs. 10%; <i>p</i> < 0.01). <b>Conclusions</b>: A 75 g flat OGTT as defined does not represent an abnormal maternal phenotype nor portend an adverse perinatal outcome.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nutrients
Published
2025-05-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17111785
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.06
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Lack of a Glucose Peak During the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test in Pregnancy: What Does It Portend for Perinatal Outcomes?

Stefano Terzoni, Stefano Manodoro, Emanuele Garzia, Nikita Alfieri et al.
1 citations
Nutrients
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
2.06
article

The Lack of a Glucose Peak During the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test in Pregnancy: What Does It Portend for Perinatal Outcomes?

Stefano Terzoni, Stefano Manodoro, Emanuele Garzia, Nikita Alfieri, Anna Maria Marconi, Patrick Catalano
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: An univocal definition for a lack of glucose peak during the oral glucose tolerance test in pregnancy (flat curve) has never been agreed upon. Thus, the aim of this study was to provide a definition for the flat 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and to assess its clinical significance. <b>Methods</b>: A retrospective cohort study, where 8.810 pregnant singleton women were evaluated at the time of a 75 g OGTT between 24<sup>0</sup> and 28<sup>6</sup> weeks for the universal screening of gestational diabetes (GDM). The 75 g OGTT was considered flat when the difference between peak and fasting glucose concentrations was ≤30 mg/dL. A total of 953 (10.8%) women were diagnosed as having GDM, while 7.857 (89.2%) had normal glucose tolerance (NGT); 2791 women with normal glucose tolerance (35.5%) had a FLAT curve and 5066 (64.5%) had a concentration difference > 30 mg/dL (NGT). In all groups, we evaluated maternal characteristics and perinatal outcome. <b>Results</b>: Women with a FLAT curve were younger, taller, thinner, and their pre-pregnancy body mass index was lower than the other groups (all <i>p</i> < 0.001). The rate of obesity was also lower (<i>p</i> < 0.01). The vaginal delivery rate was higher than in NGT (80.4% vs. 77.8%; <i>p</i> < 0.01) and women with GDM (73.0%; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and that of primary cesarean lower than in NGT (11.9% vs. 14.8%; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and women with GDM (18.2%; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Between women with a FLAT and NGT OGTT curve, there was no significant difference for birthweight < 10th percentile (6.9% vs. 6.2%; <i>p</i> = 0.2), though the proportion of birthweight > 90th was lower (8% vs. 10%; <i>p</i> < 0.01). <b>Conclusions</b>: A 75 g flat OGTT as defined does not represent an abnormal maternal phenotype nor portend an adverse perinatal outcome.

NutrientsVol. 17(11)
Harvard University (US), University of Milan (IT), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Ospedale San Paolo (IT), Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Santi Paolo e Carlo
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
2.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.