Impacts of Ecological Restoration Projects on Ecosystem Carbon Storage of Tongluo Mountain Mining Area, Chongqing, in Southwest China

Surface mining activities cause severe disruption to ecosystems, resulting in the substantial destruction of surface vegetation, the loss of soil organic carbon stocks, and a decrease in the ecosystem’s ability to sequester carbon. The ecological restoration of mining areas has been found to significantly enhance the carbon storage capacity of ecosystems. This study evaluated ecological restoration strategies in Chongqing’s Tongluo Mountain mining area by integrating GF-6 satellite multispectral data (2 m panchromatic/8 m multispectral resolution) with ground surveys across 45 quadrats to develop a quadratic regression model based on vegetation indices and the field-measured biomass. The methodology quantified carbon storage variations among engineered restoration (ER), natural recovery (NR), and unmanaged sites (CWR) while identifying optimal vegetation configurations for karst ecosystems. The methodology combined the high-spatial-resolution satellite imagery for large-scale vegetation mapping with field-measured biomass calibration to enhance the quantitative accuracy, enabling an efficient carbon storage assessment across heterogeneous landscapes. This hybrid approach overcame the limitations of traditional plot-based methods by providing spatially explicit, cost-effective monitoring solutions for mining ecosystems. The results demonstrate that engineered restoration significantly enhances carbon sequestration, with the aboveground vegetation biomass reaching 5.07 ± 1.05 tC/ha, a value 21% higher than in natural recovery areas (4.18 ± 0.23 tC/ha) and 189% greater than at unmanaged sites (1.75 ± 1.03 tC/ha). In areas subjected to engineered restoration, both the vegetation and soil carbon storage showed an upward trend, with soil carbon sequestration being the primary form, contributing to 81% of the total carbon storage, and with engineered restoration areas exceeding natural recovery and unmanaged zones by 17.6% and 106%, respectively, in terms of their soil carbon density (40.41 ± 9.99 tC/ha). Significant variations in the carbon sequestration capacity were observed across vegetation types. Bamboo forests exhibited the highest carbon density (25.8 tC/ha), followed by tree forests (2.54 ± 0.53 tC/ha), while grasslands showed the lowest values (0.88 ± 0.52 tC/ha). For future restoration initiatives, it is advisable to select suitable vegetation types based on the local dominant species for a comprehensive approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land
Published
2025-05-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/land14061149
Primary Topic
Mining and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impacts of Ecological Restoration Projects on Ecosystem Carbon Storage of Tongluo Mountain Mining Area, Chongqing, in Southwest China

Yongyun Hu, Peng Xu, Lei Ma, Chao Jiang et al.
Land
Mining and Resource Management
article

Impacts of Ecological Restoration Projects on Ecosystem Carbon Storage of Tongluo Mountain Mining Area, Chongqing, in Southwest China

Yongyun Hu, Peng Xu, Lei Ma, Chao Jiang, Hongtao Si, Chen Wang, Cheng Li, Mingze Xu, Dongxue Zhu, Manyi Li
article en

Abstract

Surface mining activities cause severe disruption to ecosystems, resulting in the substantial destruction of surface vegetation, the loss of soil organic carbon stocks, and a decrease in the ecosystem’s ability to sequester carbon. The ecological restoration of mining areas has been found to significantly enhance the carbon storage capacity of ecosystems. This study evaluated ecological restoration strategies in Chongqing’s Tongluo Mountain mining area by integrating GF-6 satellite multispectral data (2 m panchromatic/8 m multispectral resolution) with ground surveys across 45 quadrats to develop a quadratic regression model based on vegetation indices and the field-measured biomass. The methodology quantified carbon storage variations among engineered restoration (ER), natural recovery (NR), and unmanaged sites (CWR) while identifying optimal vegetation configurations for karst ecosystems. The methodology combined the high-spatial-resolution satellite imagery for large-scale vegetation mapping with field-measured biomass calibration to enhance the quantitative accuracy, enabling an efficient carbon storage assessment across heterogeneous landscapes. This hybrid approach overcame the limitations of traditional plot-based methods by providing spatially explicit, cost-effective monitoring solutions for mining ecosystems. The results demonstrate that engineered restoration significantly enhances carbon sequestration, with the aboveground vegetation biomass reaching 5.07 ± 1.05 tC/ha, a value 21% higher than in natural recovery areas (4.18 ± 0.23 tC/ha) and 189% greater than at unmanaged sites (1.75 ± 1.03 tC/ha). In areas subjected to engineered restoration, both the vegetation and soil carbon storage showed an upward trend, with soil carbon sequestration being the primary form, contributing to 81% of the total carbon storage, and with engineered restoration areas exceeding natural recovery and unmanaged zones by 17.6% and 106%, respectively, in terms of their soil carbon density (40.41 ± 9.99 tC/ha). Significant variations in the carbon sequestration capacity were observed across vegetation types. Bamboo forests exhibited the highest carbon density (25.8 tC/ha), followed by tree forests (2.54 ± 0.53 tC/ha), while grasslands showed the lowest values (0.88 ± 0.52 tC/ha). For future restoration initiatives, it is advisable to select suitable vegetation types based on the local dominant species for a comprehensive approach.

LandVol. 14(6)
Chongqing University (CN), Ministry of Natural Resources (CN), Beijing Forestry University (CN), Chongqing Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources (CN)
Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing, Centre Scientifique et Technique du Bâtiment
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Mining and Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.