Comparing Domain Expert and Machine Learning Data Enrichment of Building Registry

Municipal decision-makers must define and quantitatively analyze full-renovation scenarios adapted to specific districts and buildings to achieve the European Union (EU) target of saving 60% to 90% of energy by renovating 75% of building stock. However, poor open-data quality presents a tenacious challenge, especially for automatic calculations or decision-making. This study addresses the challenge of enriching Estonian Building Registry (EBR) data by predicting the actual external wall type from existing registry information. To achieve this, both domain expert rules and machine learning models were employed. The study used a training dataset of 416 buildings and a test dataset of 66 buildings. While previous research comparing expert-based and machine learning approaches has been limited and yielded mixed results, our findings demonstrate that both methods perform similarly, improving the initial wall type classification accuracy from 54% to 89%.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2025-05-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15111798
Primary Topic
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing Domain Expert and Machine Learning Data Enrichment of Building Registry

Ergo Pikas, Ants Torim, Tarmo Robal, Innar Liiv et al.
Buildings
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
article

Comparing Domain Expert and Machine Learning Data Enrichment of Building Registry

Ergo Pikas, Ants Torim, Tarmo Robal, Innar Liiv, Targo Kalamees, Elisa Iliste
article en

Abstract

Municipal decision-makers must define and quantitatively analyze full-renovation scenarios adapted to specific districts and buildings to achieve the European Union (EU) target of saving 60% to 90% of energy by renovating 75% of building stock. However, poor open-data quality presents a tenacious challenge, especially for automatic calculations or decision-making. This study addresses the challenge of enriching Estonian Building Registry (EBR) data by predicting the actual external wall type from existing registry information. To achieve this, both domain expert rules and machine learning models were employed. The study used a training dataset of 416 buildings and a test dataset of 66 buildings. While previous research comparing expert-based and machine learning approaches has been limited and yielded mixed results, our findings demonstrate that both methods perform similarly, improving the initial wall type classification accuracy from 54% to 89%.

BuildingsVol. 15(11)
Tallinn University of Technology (EE)
European Commission, Eesti Teadusagentuur
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparing Domain Expert and Machine Learning Data Enrichment of Building Registry — Ergo Pikas, Ants Torim, et al. · Buildings (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS