Motor Dexterity Deficits in Individuals With First‐Episode Psychosis and Their First‐Degree Relatives

ABSTRACT Introduction Motor dexterity deficits have been observed both before and during first‐episode psychosis (FEP), suggesting this may be a potential endophenotype for schizophrenia spectrum disorders. We aimed to compare motor dexterity performance in FEP patients, their first‐degree relatives, and controls. We also investigated whether sociodemographic, premorbid, clinical, and cognitive factors contribute to motor dexterity. Methods The sample included 133 FEP patients, 244 of their first‐degree relatives (146 parents, 98 siblings), and 202 controls. Motor dexterity was assessed using the Grooved Pegboard Test as part of a neuropsychological battery assessing verbal and visual memory, processing speed, working memory, executive function, attention, and theory of mind. Raw scores were converted to Z ‐scores. Intelligence quotient and global cognitive function were estimated. Group comparisons were made using analysis of covariance with post hoc tests. Age, sex, and years of education were included as covariates. Multiple linear regression models examined associations between motor dexterity and other variables within each group. Results There was a significant group difference on the Grooved Pegboard Test ( F = 16.25, p < 0.001). FEP patients (M = −1.26) and their parents (M = −1.14) scored lowest, while siblings (M = −0.30) and controls (M = −0.22) scored highest. The FEP group also scored lowest on other cognitive tests ( p < 0.001). A positive association between global cognitive function and Grooved Pegboard performance was found in all groups ( β = 0.47–0.84, p < 0.001). Group‐specific associations with age, sex, education, intelligence, executive function, attention, and processing speed were also observed ( p < 0.05). Conclusions Motor dexterity deficits were observed in FEP patients and their parents, which may reflect underlying genetic liability or result from the disorder itself. The preserved motor dexterity in unaffected siblings challenges a strict endophenotypic interpretation and suggests a potential protective effect. Motor dexterity deficits were associated with broader cognitive impairment, intelligence quotient, attention, processing speed, and executive function.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Published
2025-05-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.13821
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Schizophrenia research and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.47

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Motor Dexterity Deficits in Individuals With First‐Episode Psychosis and Their First‐Degree Relatives

Manuel Sevilla‐Ramos, Rosa Ayesa‐Arriola, Valentina Ladera, Ricardo García García
1 citations
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Schizophrenia research and treatment
1.47
article

Motor Dexterity Deficits in Individuals With First‐Episode Psychosis and Their First‐Degree Relatives

Manuel Sevilla‐Ramos, Rosa Ayesa‐Arriola, Valentina Ladera, Ricardo García García
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction Motor dexterity deficits have been observed both before and during first‐episode psychosis (FEP), suggesting this may be a potential endophenotype for schizophrenia spectrum disorders. We aimed to compare motor dexterity performance in FEP patients, their first‐degree relatives, and controls. We also investigated whether sociodemographic, premorbid, clinical, and cognitive factors contribute to motor dexterity. Methods The sample included 133 FEP patients, 244 of their first‐degree relatives (146 parents, 98 siblings), and 202 controls. Motor dexterity was assessed using the Grooved Pegboard Test as part of a neuropsychological battery assessing verbal and visual memory, processing speed, working memory, executive function, attention, and theory of mind. Raw scores were converted to Z ‐scores. Intelligence quotient and global cognitive function were estimated. Group comparisons were made using analysis of covariance with post hoc tests. Age, sex, and years of education were included as covariates. Multiple linear regression models examined associations between motor dexterity and other variables within each group. Results There was a significant group difference on the Grooved Pegboard Test ( F = 16.25, p < 0.001). FEP patients (M = −1.26) and their parents (M = −1.14) scored lowest, while siblings (M = −0.30) and controls (M = −0.22) scored highest. The FEP group also scored lowest on other cognitive tests ( p < 0.001). A positive association between global cognitive function and Grooved Pegboard performance was found in all groups ( β = 0.47–0.84, p < 0.001). Group‐specific associations with age, sex, education, intelligence, executive function, attention, and processing speed were also observed ( p < 0.05). Conclusions Motor dexterity deficits were observed in FEP patients and their parents, which may reflect underlying genetic liability or result from the disorder itself. The preserved motor dexterity in unaffected siblings challenges a strict endophenotypic interpretation and suggests a potential protective effect. Motor dexterity deficits were associated with broader cognitive impairment, intelligence quotient, attention, processing speed, and executive function.

Acta Psychiatrica ScandinavicaVol. 152(3)
Universidad de Cantabria (ES), Universidad de Salamanca (ES), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (ES), Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla (ES)
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Instituto de Salud Carlos III
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Schizophrenia research and treatment
1.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.