GenAI and the Mirage of Personalised Learning for All

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is gaining attention in education, particularly for its potential to personalise learning. However, studies have yet to assess its effectiveness and identify its limitations within controlled educational contexts across various disciplines and GenAI models. This study aims to help fill this gap by evaluating ‘SmartTest’, a GenAI chatbot designed by the authors to prompt questions, offer immediate feedback, and stimulate critical thinking through conversational nudges. Over five test cycles, SmartTest was used in a criminal law course at an Australian university. The results revealed SmartTest struggled with complex structured problem-solving exercises. While SmartTest showed some promise in aiding short-answer question learning, it remained limited and prone to inaccuracies. These findings highlight concerns that inflated expectations of GenAI could mislead educators and investors about its capabilities to deliver economically viable and quality personalised learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Law Technology and Humans
Published
2025-05-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5204/lthj.3764
Primary Topic
Open Education and E-Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

GenAI and the Mirage of Personalised Learning for All

Armin Alimardani, Emma A. Jane
Law Technology and Humans
Open Education and E-Learning
article

GenAI and the Mirage of Personalised Learning for All

Armin Alimardani, Emma A. Jane
article en

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is gaining attention in education, particularly for its potential to personalise learning. However, studies have yet to assess its effectiveness and identify its limitations within controlled educational contexts across various disciplines and GenAI models. This study aims to help fill this gap by evaluating ‘SmartTest’, a GenAI chatbot designed by the authors to prompt questions, offer immediate feedback, and stimulate critical thinking through conversational nudges. Over five test cycles, SmartTest was used in a criminal law course at an Australian university. The results revealed SmartTest struggled with complex structured problem-solving exercises. While SmartTest showed some promise in aiding short-answer question learning, it remained limited and prone to inaccuracies. These findings highlight concerns that inflated expectations of GenAI could mislead educators and investors about its capabilities to deliver economically viable and quality personalised learning.

Law Technology and Humans
University of Wollongong (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU)
University of New South Wales
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Open Education and E-Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

GenAI and the Mirage of Personalised Learning for All — Armin Alimardani, Emma A. Jane · Law Technology and Humans (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS