Evaluating mosses on bioreceptive concrete: Effective sound absorbers?

• The sound absorption of six moss species commonly found on urban concrete was tested • P. capillare had the highest sound absorption, followed by other acrocarp species • Moss can play a role in mitigating urban noise, mainly for frequencies above 1000Hz • Sound absorption of moss compares favourably to commonly used urban climbing plants • Due to its lack of a growth substrate, moss is outperformed by Living Wall Systems Moss-covered bioreceptive concrete is a novel green vertical structure which can be applied to a wide variety of structures due to its low structural and maintenance requirements. One of the potential benefits of using moss-covered concrete is its ability to absorb sound, the extent of which is currently unknown. Therefore, the effectiveness in attenuating (urban) noise of six moss species in different hydration states was assessed and compared to bare concrete and other vertical green structures. Results show that using moss-covered concrete increases sound absorption compared to bare concrete in nearly all situations. The best-performing mosses overall were acrocarp species, particularly P. capillare , which reached a peak sound absorption coefficient of 0.86 and an average of up to 0.48 (50-6400Hz). Its results are also relatively constant across hydration states. On the other hand, G. pulvinata outperformed P. capillare when dry, but not when hydrated or wet. The pleurocarp species showed the lowest sound absorption. Finally, the thickness of the moss layer has a minor impact on absorption. The acrocarp moss species compare favourably to (in)direct vertical green structures using climbing plants, whereas the sound absorption of the pleurocarp species is slightly lower. However, the sound absorption of moss-covered concrete is significantly lower than that of vertical green structures using a growing substrate (Living Wall Systems), as the substrate provides the bulk of the absorption in this case. In conclusion, the moss-covered bioreceptive concrete presents a viable alternative to (in)direct green structures, although benefits are mostly limited to frequencies above 1000Hz.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Building and Environment
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113194
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Building materials and conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating mosses on bioreceptive concrete: Effective sound absorbers?

H.M. Jonkers, Marc Ottelé, M. Veeger
1 citations
Building and Environment
Building materials and conservation
1.67
article

Evaluating mosses on bioreceptive concrete: Effective sound absorbers?

H.M. Jonkers, Marc Ottelé, M. Veeger
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• The sound absorption of six moss species commonly found on urban concrete was tested • P. capillare had the highest sound absorption, followed by other acrocarp species • Moss can play a role in mitigating urban noise, mainly for frequencies above 1000Hz • Sound absorption of moss compares favourably to commonly used urban climbing plants • Due to its lack of a growth substrate, moss is outperformed by Living Wall Systems Moss-covered bioreceptive concrete is a novel green vertical structure which can be applied to a wide variety of structures due to its low structural and maintenance requirements. One of the potential benefits of using moss-covered concrete is its ability to absorb sound, the extent of which is currently unknown. Therefore, the effectiveness in attenuating (urban) noise of six moss species in different hydration states was assessed and compared to bare concrete and other vertical green structures. Results show that using moss-covered concrete increases sound absorption compared to bare concrete in nearly all situations. The best-performing mosses overall were acrocarp species, particularly P. capillare , which reached a peak sound absorption coefficient of 0.86 and an average of up to 0.48 (50-6400Hz). Its results are also relatively constant across hydration states. On the other hand, G. pulvinata outperformed P. capillare when dry, but not when hydrated or wet. The pleurocarp species showed the lowest sound absorption. Finally, the thickness of the moss layer has a minor impact on absorption. The acrocarp moss species compare favourably to (in)direct vertical green structures using climbing plants, whereas the sound absorption of the pleurocarp species is slightly lower. However, the sound absorption of moss-covered concrete is significantly lower than that of vertical green structures using a growing substrate (Living Wall Systems), as the substrate provides the bulk of the absorption in this case. In conclusion, the moss-covered bioreceptive concrete presents a viable alternative to (in)direct green structures, although benefits are mostly limited to frequencies above 1000Hz.

Building and EnvironmentVol. 281
Delft University of Technology (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Building materials and conservation
1.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.