Anemia Classification Using Hybrid Machine Learning Models: A Comparative Study of Ensemble Techniques on CBC Data

Anemia is a prevalent and potentially serious medical condition characterized by a deficiency in the number or quality of red blood cells. Accurate classification of anemia types is crucial for ensuring appropriate treatment, as different types of anemia require distinct therapeutic approaches. However, the classification of anemia presents specific challenges due to the complexity of the condition, the variability in CBC data, and the need to differentiate between multiple anemia types that may present with overlapping symptoms. In this study, we explore the application of hybrid machine learning models to classify anemia types using Complete Blood Count (CBC) data. We evaluated the performance of various models, including DecisionTree, RandomForest, XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, and ensemble methods such as Stacking and Voting. The ensemble models, particularly Stacking and Voting, demonstrated superior performance with balanced accuracy reaching 0.9976 and F1 scores of 0.9964, significantly outperforming individual classifiers. These results underscore the efficacy of ensemble techniques in handling the complex and imbalanced datasets commonly encountered in medical diagnostics. Despite their high accuracy, we identified challenges related to model interpretability, computational demands, and data quality. The complexity and resource requirements of these models may limit their practical application in resource-constrained environments. This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the trade-offs between model complexity, accuracy, and interpretability, offering valuable insights for the deployment of machine learning models in clinical settings. Our findings highlight the potential of hybrid models to improve anemia diagnosis, suggesting their integration into healthcare systems could enhance diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes. Future work will focus on expanding the dataset, refining model interpretability, and addressing ethical considerations in the use of AI in healthcare.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computer System and Informatics (JoSYC)
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47065/josyc.v5i4.5848
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Machine Learning and Data Classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anemia Classification Using Hybrid Machine Learning Models: A Comparative Study of Ensemble Techniques on CBC Data

Gregorius Airlangga
1 citations
Journal of Computer System and Informatics (JoSYC)
Machine Learning and Data Classification
0.35
article

Anemia Classification Using Hybrid Machine Learning Models: A Comparative Study of Ensemble Techniques on CBC Data

Gregorius Airlangga
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Anemia is a prevalent and potentially serious medical condition characterized by a deficiency in the number or quality of red blood cells. Accurate classification of anemia types is crucial for ensuring appropriate treatment, as different types of anemia require distinct therapeutic approaches. However, the classification of anemia presents specific challenges due to the complexity of the condition, the variability in CBC data, and the need to differentiate between multiple anemia types that may present with overlapping symptoms. In this study, we explore the application of hybrid machine learning models to classify anemia types using Complete Blood Count (CBC) data. We evaluated the performance of various models, including DecisionTree, RandomForest, XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, and ensemble methods such as Stacking and Voting. The ensemble models, particularly Stacking and Voting, demonstrated superior performance with balanced accuracy reaching 0.9976 and F1 scores of 0.9964, significantly outperforming individual classifiers. These results underscore the efficacy of ensemble techniques in handling the complex and imbalanced datasets commonly encountered in medical diagnostics. Despite their high accuracy, we identified challenges related to model interpretability, computational demands, and data quality. The complexity and resource requirements of these models may limit their practical application in resource-constrained environments. This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the trade-offs between model complexity, accuracy, and interpretability, offering valuable insights for the deployment of machine learning models in clinical settings. Our findings highlight the potential of hybrid models to improve anemia diagnosis, suggesting their integration into healthcare systems could enhance diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes. Future work will focus on expanding the dataset, refining model interpretability, and addressing ethical considerations in the use of AI in healthcare.

Journal of Computer System and Informatics (JoSYC)Vol. 5(4)
Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Machine Learning and Data Classification
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.