A Descriptive Analysis of Student Performance in Written Exams and Practical Tasks in Science 7 under the MATATAG Curriculum

The implementation of the MATATAG Curriculum in the Philippines marked a major shift in basic education, emphasizing the integration of theoretical knowledge with practical application, particularly in Science. This study examined the academic performance of Grade 7 students in Science by comparing written examination scores and practical task outcomes. It employed a mixed-methods research design and collected data from 150 students, selected through cluster sampling from six Grade 7 sections in St. Paul University Surigao, during the Academic Year 2024–2025. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the performance levels and variability, while a one-way ANOVA tested significant differences across assessment types and student profiles. The findings revealed that students performed poorly in written examinations (mean ≈ 35.5 out of 60) with high variability, whereas their performance in practical tasks was consistently high (mean ≈ 52 out of 60) with low variability. A statistically significant difference in written exam performance was observed between male and female students, while no significant difference was found in practical task scores. These results highlighted the need for enhanced instructional strategies and more balanced assessment methods aligned with the MATATAG Curriculum.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies
Published
2025-05-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47760/cognizance.2025.v05i05.047
Primary Topic
Educational Research and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Descriptive Analysis of Student Performance in Written Exams and Practical Tasks in Science 7 under the MATATAG Curriculum

Mary Louie E. Galaura, Ricky Boy E. Limlingan, María Jesús Monteagudo Sánchez, Den Karl G. Flores et al.
Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies
Educational Research and Pedagogy
article

A Descriptive Analysis of Student Performance in Written Exams and Practical Tasks in Science 7 under the MATATAG Curriculum

Mary Louie E. Galaura, Ricky Boy E. Limlingan, María Jesús Monteagudo Sánchez, Den Karl G. Flores, Ian S. Umpil, Jade Stephanie B. Cerezo, Charlotte D. Elicano, Manilyn C. Lapiz, June Antonette C. Taglucop, Rodnie M. Tagubar, Kent Lloyd M. Destajo, Joey S. Simbajon
article en

Abstract

The implementation of the MATATAG Curriculum in the Philippines marked a major shift in basic education, emphasizing the integration of theoretical knowledge with practical application, particularly in Science. This study examined the academic performance of Grade 7 students in Science by comparing written examination scores and practical task outcomes. It employed a mixed-methods research design and collected data from 150 students, selected through cluster sampling from six Grade 7 sections in St. Paul University Surigao, during the Academic Year 2024–2025. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the performance levels and variability, while a one-way ANOVA tested significant differences across assessment types and student profiles. The findings revealed that students performed poorly in written examinations (mean ≈ 35.5 out of 60) with high variability, whereas their performance in practical tasks was consistently high (mean ≈ 52 out of 60) with low variability. A statistically significant difference in written exam performance was observed between male and female students, while no significant difference was found in practical task scores. These results highlighted the need for enhanced instructional strategies and more balanced assessment methods aligned with the MATATAG Curriculum.

Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary StudiesVol. 5(5)
Saint Paul University Surigao (PH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Educational Research and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.