Factors Affecting Medical Students’ Interest in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Background: From 2015 to 2024 the number of residency applications to OB-GYN have gone up 17.4%, from 1,829 to 2,1481.Despite the rise in residency applications to OB-GYN in the United States, no recent studies have examined factors that influence or deter osteopathic medical students from pursuing this field. A small number of similar studies have been conducted in other countries, with recurring deterrents to the field being lifestyle, gender disproportions (for male students), and litigation concerns. The aim of this study is to investigate factors influencing American osteopathic medical students’ interest in OB-GYN, with a special focus in the differences between male and female responses. Methods: Thhis Survey was offered to 1,200 osteopathic medical students in CREOG District V during 2021-2022 academic year. The factors examined included but are not limited to: demographics, level of interest/disinterest in the field, hours worked, length of residency, liability, patient population, competitiveness, and female predominance. These factors were then stratified into “non-factor, minor factor, and major factor” in a student’s decision. Respondents were broken down into male and female. Only two responses listed “other” for gender, and as this was not large enough to conduct a distinct analysis, they were excluded from the study. A combination of Pearson’s Chi Squared and Fisher’s Exact Tests used to conduct analyses. Results: ● 392 responses used in data analysis: 242 (62%) female and 150 (38%) male across 4 graduating classes. ● Those interested in OB-GYN more likely to consider prestige, patient continuity, patient population, and ability to perform procedures. Of note, those who specified interest in OB-GYN were all female respondents (n=26). ● Males more likely to cite disinterest, female predominance, and patient population as reasons for deciding against OB-GYN. Females more likely to cite competitiveness, liability, and lifestyle as reasons that would deter them from the field. Discussion: Factors differ between male and female osteopathic medical students regarding a decision of whether or not to pursue a career in OB-GYN. Some factors more easily modifiable than others, specifically, addressing concerns over lifestyle, competitiveness, and liability. This study highlights the importance of accurate clinical education, adequate career counseling, and robust clinical exposures during OB/GYN rotations to provide positive experiences highlighting the breadth of the field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
North American Proceedings in Gynecology and Obstetrics - Supplemental
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54053/001c.138591
Primary Topic
Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors Affecting Medical Students’ Interest in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Trevor A. Pickering, Hindi E. Stohl, Kimberly Huynh, A C Thai et al.
North American Proceedings in Gynecology and Obstetrics - Supplemental
Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
article

Factors Affecting Medical Students’ Interest in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Trevor A. Pickering, Hindi E. Stohl, Kimberly Huynh, A C Thai, Joshua A Bellisario
article en

Abstract

Background: From 2015 to 2024 the number of residency applications to OB-GYN have gone up 17.4%, from 1,829 to 2,1481.Despite the rise in residency applications to OB-GYN in the United States, no recent studies have examined factors that influence or deter osteopathic medical students from pursuing this field. A small number of similar studies have been conducted in other countries, with recurring deterrents to the field being lifestyle, gender disproportions (for male students), and litigation concerns. The aim of this study is to investigate factors influencing American osteopathic medical students’ interest in OB-GYN, with a special focus in the differences between male and female responses. Methods: Thhis Survey was offered to 1,200 osteopathic medical students in CREOG District V during 2021-2022 academic year. The factors examined included but are not limited to: demographics, level of interest/disinterest in the field, hours worked, length of residency, liability, patient population, competitiveness, and female predominance. These factors were then stratified into “non-factor, minor factor, and major factor” in a student’s decision. Respondents were broken down into male and female. Only two responses listed “other” for gender, and as this was not large enough to conduct a distinct analysis, they were excluded from the study. A combination of Pearson’s Chi Squared and Fisher’s Exact Tests used to conduct analyses. Results: ● 392 responses used in data analysis: 242 (62%) female and 150 (38%) male across 4 graduating classes. ● Those interested in OB-GYN more likely to consider prestige, patient continuity, patient population, and ability to perform procedures. Of note, those who specified interest in OB-GYN were all female respondents (n=26). ● Males more likely to cite disinterest, female predominance, and patient population as reasons for deciding against OB-GYN. Females more likely to cite competitiveness, liability, and lifestyle as reasons that would deter them from the field. Discussion: Factors differ between male and female osteopathic medical students regarding a decision of whether or not to pursue a career in OB-GYN. Some factors more easily modifiable than others, specifically, addressing concerns over lifestyle, competitiveness, and liability. This study highlights the importance of accurate clinical education, adequate career counseling, and robust clinical exposures during OB/GYN rotations to provide positive experiences highlighting the breadth of the field.

North American Proceedings in Gynecology and Obstetrics - Supplemental
University of Southern California (US), Western University (CA), California Southern University (US), Harbor–UCLA Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.