Service evaluation and treatment pathways in an intensive community treatment service for adolescents in crisis services: What can we learn?

<b>Background:</b> Intensive community treatment services are emerging as an alternative to admission and/or to support discharge from hospital. This service evaluation aims to assess treatment pathways and factors associated with treatment duration and general functioning. <b>Methods:</b> A service evaluation using routinely collected data from an intensive community treatment service between 2016 and 2023 was performed. <b>Results:</b> 141 adolescents aged 12 to 17 received intensive community treatment over 8 years. The average treatment duration was 29.2 weeks, significantly longer than the initial 12-week pathway proposed. Those treated for significantly longer seemed to present with more complex mental health needs. Lack of education provision, being part of an ethnic minority or having a higher number of services involved were significantly associated with higher treatment duration (<i>p</i> < .05). <b>Conclusion:</b> Results suggest that a longer treatment pathway might be necessary in intensive community care, so a 24-week treatment pathway was proposed. General functioning also improved over the course of treatment, and 89.4% were discharged back to their local community teams. The involvement of multiple specialist services and the presence of specific diagnoses (e.g., autism) deserve consideration. Future evaluations will clarify if more targeted treatment pathways are more effective and efficient.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Published
2025-05-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13591045251343115
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Psychiatric care and mental health services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Service evaluation and treatment pathways in an intensive community treatment service for adolescents in crisis services: What can we learn?

Amabel Dessain, Ana Pascual-Sánchez, Dennis Ougrin, Emma L. Baker et al.
1 citations
Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Psychiatric care and mental health services
2.31
article

Service evaluation and treatment pathways in an intensive community treatment service for adolescents in crisis services: What can we learn?

Amabel Dessain, Ana Pascual-Sánchez, Dennis Ougrin, Emma L. Baker, Clara N. Lee, Nidhita Singh, Toby Zundel, Paulina Smoter
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Intensive community treatment services are emerging as an alternative to admission and/or to support discharge from hospital. This service evaluation aims to assess treatment pathways and factors associated with treatment duration and general functioning. <b>Methods:</b> A service evaluation using routinely collected data from an intensive community treatment service between 2016 and 2023 was performed. <b>Results:</b> 141 adolescents aged 12 to 17 received intensive community treatment over 8 years. The average treatment duration was 29.2 weeks, significantly longer than the initial 12-week pathway proposed. Those treated for significantly longer seemed to present with more complex mental health needs. Lack of education provision, being part of an ethnic minority or having a higher number of services involved were significantly associated with higher treatment duration (<i>p</i> < .05). <b>Conclusion:</b> Results suggest that a longer treatment pathway might be necessary in intensive community care, so a 24-week treatment pathway was proposed. General functioning also improved over the course of treatment, and 89.4% were discharged back to their local community teams. The involvement of multiple specialist services and the presence of specific diagnoses (e.g., autism) deserve consideration. Future evaluations will clarify if more targeted treatment pathways are more effective and efficient.

Clinical Child Psychology and PsychiatryVol. 30(3)
Queen Mary University of London (GB), South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Psychiatric care and mental health services
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.