No escape from microplastics: Contamination of reef manta ray feeding areas in a remote, protected archipelago

Abstract Remote islands receive plastic debris from elsewhere, ranging from microplastics (>5 mm) to macroplastics, which can further breakdown into microplastics. The ingestion of microplastics by marine species has been linked to decreased fitness. Reef manta rays, Mobula alfredi , are liable to ingest microplastics due to their filter‐feeding strategy and habitat overlap with plastic hotspots. Their population is in decline due to unsustainable fishing pressures and a slow life history, with potential additional demographic pressure from plastic pollution. This study investigates the concentration and characteristics of microplastics in the top 0.5 m of the water column in reef manta rays feeding areas around the Chagos Archipelago, a large remote marine protected area that is highly contaminated by macroplastic debris. Across all samples, a mean of 1.1 microparticle/m 3 was found, the majority of which were blue and black fibers. Half of the particles were confirmed as synthetic (53.6%, n = 305 out of 569 Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy'd particles), with the main synthetic polymers being polyester (21.1%), polypropylene (8.8%) and nylon (4.6%). Egmont Atoll, an International Union for Conservation of Nature “Important Shark and Ray Area” for its importance to reef manta rays, was the most contaminated atoll around the archipelago (1.6 microparticle/m 3 ). Continued regular beach cleans in important areas for biodiversity are recommended, as well as implementing new methods to reduce local input of microplastics, such as washing machine filters, and ultimately a global continued effort to reduce plastic usage and improve its disposal.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conservation Science and Practice
Published
2025-05-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.70059
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.50

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

No escape from microplastics: Contamination of reef manta ray feeding areas in a remote, protected archipelago

James Savage, Heather J. Koldewey, David Morritt, J. Marcus Rowcliffe et al.
1 citations
Conservation Science and Practice
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
0.50
article

No escape from microplastics: Contamination of reef manta ray feeding areas in a remote, protected archipelago

James Savage, Heather J. Koldewey, David Morritt, J. Marcus Rowcliffe, Tom B. Letessier, JM Harris
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Remote islands receive plastic debris from elsewhere, ranging from microplastics (>5 mm) to macroplastics, which can further breakdown into microplastics. The ingestion of microplastics by marine species has been linked to decreased fitness. Reef manta rays, Mobula alfredi , are liable to ingest microplastics due to their filter‐feeding strategy and habitat overlap with plastic hotspots. Their population is in decline due to unsustainable fishing pressures and a slow life history, with potential additional demographic pressure from plastic pollution. This study investigates the concentration and characteristics of microplastics in the top 0.5 m of the water column in reef manta rays feeding areas around the Chagos Archipelago, a large remote marine protected area that is highly contaminated by macroplastic debris. Across all samples, a mean of 1.1 microparticle/m 3 was found, the majority of which were blue and black fibers. Half of the particles were confirmed as synthetic (53.6%, n = 305 out of 569 Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy'd particles), with the main synthetic polymers being polyester (21.1%), polypropylene (8.8%) and nylon (4.6%). Egmont Atoll, an International Union for Conservation of Nature “Important Shark and Ray Area” for its importance to reef manta rays, was the most contaminated atoll around the archipelago (1.6 microparticle/m 3 ). Continued regular beach cleans in important areas for biodiversity are recommended, as well as implementing new methods to reduce local input of microplastics, such as washing machine filters, and ultimately a global continued effort to reduce plastic usage and improve its disposal.

Conservation Science and PracticeVol. 8(3)
Zoological Society of London (GB), Royal Holloway University of London (GB), University of Exeter (GB), University of Plymouth (GB)
Fondation Bertarelli, Zoological Society of London, Natural England, Natural Environment Research Council, Directorate-General for the Environment, Royal Holloway, University of London
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
0.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.