Ámósz és Malakiás könyvének társadalomkritikája

Zech 7:7-10 summarises the word proclaimed by the prophets in the context of social criticism. However, this approach does not lead to a unified view of the Twelve Minor Prophets. While the theme is present in all three major sections of the book of Amos, it seems to be mentioned only incidentally in the book of Malachi. Yet changes in the social context could have been conducive to the development of such a critical voice. In addition to the detail of the prophetic motivation, we should also note the difference in the oppressed. While Mal 3:5b basically evokes the group of personae miserae, the book of Amos is more concerned with the hardships of those social strata whose economic survival is threatened. There is, however, an important similarity in the parallelism of the terms used to describe the abuses. And although both books emphasise the role of the violated מִשְׁפָּט, there is a huge difference in naming who is to blame for the violation. While the picture of the disorder in Samaria is one of human responsibility, Mal 2:17 questions God's authority. Finally, the incorporation of socio-ethical abuses into the prophetic argument is a fundamental and essential element of the thought structure of both books. The logical structure thus created is designed to unfold the message of divine judgement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sárospataki füzetek
Published
2025-05-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59914/sf.29.2025.1.3
Primary Topic
Hungarian Social, Economic and Educational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ámósz és Malakiás könyvének társadalomkritikája

Sándor Bihari
Sárospataki füzetek
Hungarian Social, Economic and Educational Studies
article

Ámósz és Malakiás könyvének társadalomkritikája

Sándor Bihari
article en

Abstract

Zech 7:7-10 summarises the word proclaimed by the prophets in the context of social criticism. However, this approach does not lead to a unified view of the Twelve Minor Prophets. While the theme is present in all three major sections of the book of Amos, it seems to be mentioned only incidentally in the book of Malachi. Yet changes in the social context could have been conducive to the development of such a critical voice. In addition to the detail of the prophetic motivation, we should also note the difference in the oppressed. While Mal 3:5b basically evokes the group of personae miserae, the book of Amos is more concerned with the hardships of those social strata whose economic survival is threatened. There is, however, an important similarity in the parallelism of the terms used to describe the abuses. And although both books emphasise the role of the violated מִשְׁפָּט, there is a huge difference in naming who is to blame for the violation. While the picture of the disorder in Samaria is one of human responsibility, Mal 2:17 questions God's authority. Finally, the incorporation of socio-ethical abuses into the prophetic argument is a fundamental and essential element of the thought structure of both books. The logical structure thus created is designed to unfold the message of divine judgement.

Sárospataki füzetekVol. 29(1)
Sárospatak Reformed Theological University (HU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Hungarian Social, Economic and Educational Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.