Comparative in vitro assessment of CYP2C19 inhibition by ilaprazole and conventional proton pump inhibitors using a high throughput fluorometric assay

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly used anti-ulcer agents, known to inhibit CYP2C19, leading to pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions (DDIs). Ilaprazole is a newer PPI with a distinct pharmacokinetic profile that is predicted to overcome CYP2C19 inhibition. The current study aimed to predict the CYP2C19 inhibitory potential of Ilaprazole versus conventional PPIs (Omeprazole, Lansoprazole, Pantoprazole, and Rabeprazole) on CYP2C19 activity using a high-throughput fluorometric assay. The Vivid™ CYP2C19 Blue Screening Kit was utilized, and fluorescence intensity was measured after incubation with PPIs, using ticlopidine as a positive inhibitor control. The inhibition percentage was calculated, and IC50 values were determined using nonlinear regression analysis in graph pad prism, further, as per regulatory guidance, the C<sub>max,u</sub>/K<sub>i</sub>,<sub>u</sub> ratio was assessed to interpret the potential for clinical drug-drug interactions of PPIs. The concentration-dependent inhibition of CYP2C19 activity by all PPIs was evaluated. The order of inhibition potency, based on IC50 and K<sub>i</sub>,<sub>u</sub> values, was found to be: Omeprazole > Lansoprazole > Pantoprazole > Rabeprazole > Ilaprazole. The results of the C<sub>max,u</sub>/K<sub>i</sub>,<sub>u</sub> ratio indicate that Omeprazole (0.0288) exceeded the cut-off value consistent with its well-documented in vivo CYP2C19 inhibitory effect. While Lansoprazole (0.00332) had a relatively higher ratio than Ilaprazole (0.00224), Pantoprazole (0.00124), and Rabeprazole (0.000635), all values remained below the regulatory cutoff, indicating minimal inhibition risk. Omeprazole is the most potent CYP2C19 inhibitor, as it exceeded the regulatory threshold guidelines for in vitro study, while other tested PPIs, including Ilaprazole, did not meet this cutoff, suggesting a lower likelihood of clinically significant inhibition. Although previous in vivo studies suggest variable inhibition with other PPIs, current data support the need for further head-to-head in vivo comparisons, particularly between Pantoprazole, Rabeprazole, and Ilaprazole, to determine the most suitable option in clinical scenarios involving CYP2C19 substrate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-05-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-02872-5
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative in vitro assessment of CYP2C19 inhibition by ilaprazole and conventional proton pump inhibitors using a high throughput fluorometric assay

Priyadharshini Ananthathandavan, Kumar D.E. Vasanth, A. Elaiyaraja, Damodharan Narayanasamy et al.
1 citations
Scientific Reports
Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
2.01
article

Comparative in vitro assessment of CYP2C19 inhibition by ilaprazole and conventional proton pump inhibitors using a high throughput fluorometric assay

Priyadharshini Ananthathandavan, Kumar D.E. Vasanth, A. Elaiyaraja, Damodharan Narayanasamy, T Vijayakumar
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly used anti-ulcer agents, known to inhibit CYP2C19, leading to pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions (DDIs). Ilaprazole is a newer PPI with a distinct pharmacokinetic profile that is predicted to overcome CYP2C19 inhibition. The current study aimed to predict the CYP2C19 inhibitory potential of Ilaprazole versus conventional PPIs (Omeprazole, Lansoprazole, Pantoprazole, and Rabeprazole) on CYP2C19 activity using a high-throughput fluorometric assay. The Vivid™ CYP2C19 Blue Screening Kit was utilized, and fluorescence intensity was measured after incubation with PPIs, using ticlopidine as a positive inhibitor control. The inhibition percentage was calculated, and IC50 values were determined using nonlinear regression analysis in graph pad prism, further, as per regulatory guidance, the C<sub>max,u</sub>/K<sub>i</sub>,<sub>u</sub> ratio was assessed to interpret the potential for clinical drug-drug interactions of PPIs. The concentration-dependent inhibition of CYP2C19 activity by all PPIs was evaluated. The order of inhibition potency, based on IC50 and K<sub>i</sub>,<sub>u</sub> values, was found to be: Omeprazole > Lansoprazole > Pantoprazole > Rabeprazole > Ilaprazole. The results of the C<sub>max,u</sub>/K<sub>i</sub>,<sub>u</sub> ratio indicate that Omeprazole (0.0288) exceeded the cut-off value consistent with its well-documented in vivo CYP2C19 inhibitory effect. While Lansoprazole (0.00332) had a relatively higher ratio than Ilaprazole (0.00224), Pantoprazole (0.00124), and Rabeprazole (0.000635), all values remained below the regulatory cutoff, indicating minimal inhibition risk. Omeprazole is the most potent CYP2C19 inhibitor, as it exceeded the regulatory threshold guidelines for in vitro study, while other tested PPIs, including Ilaprazole, did not meet this cutoff, suggesting a lower likelihood of clinically significant inhibition. Although previous in vivo studies suggest variable inhibition with other PPIs, current data support the need for further head-to-head in vivo comparisons, particularly between Pantoprazole, Rabeprazole, and Ilaprazole, to determine the most suitable option in clinical scenarios involving CYP2C19 substrate.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
SRM Institute of Science and Technology (IN)
SRM Institute of Science and Technology
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.