Civil Society Carving Spaces of Resistance in Preventing and Countering Violent Extremism Policies and Practices

This research explores the discursive strategies of resistance employed by civil society actors in the preventing and countering violent extremism (P/CVE) policy landscape. Using critical discourse analysis and ethnographic methods, this study examines how civil society constructs counter-hegemonic discourses and P/CVE practices. Whilst civil society plays a crucial role in peacebuilding, research has also shown that they are entangled in a complex web of power relations. As intermediaries between the global, national, and local levels they engage in discursive practices that could both reinforce and contest dominant discourses and practices. This paper conceptualises these practices as occurring through multiple sites of power, where civil society acts as producers, consumers, targets, and beneficiaries of knowledge and practices. Within these subject positions, they negotiate with dominant (often eurocentric) discourses through strategies of vernacularisation , appropriation , and counterarguments . While these tactics may not entirely result in discursive shifts, they however open space for critical negotiation with dominant discourses which is a crucial step to resisting power structures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alternatives Global Local Political
Published
2025-05-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03043754251343003
Primary Topic
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Civil Society Carving Spaces of Resistance in Preventing and Countering Violent Extremism Policies and Practices

Miraji Hassan Mohamed
Alternatives Global Local Political
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
article

Civil Society Carving Spaces of Resistance in Preventing and Countering Violent Extremism Policies and Practices

Miraji Hassan Mohamed
article en

Abstract

This research explores the discursive strategies of resistance employed by civil society actors in the preventing and countering violent extremism (P/CVE) policy landscape. Using critical discourse analysis and ethnographic methods, this study examines how civil society constructs counter-hegemonic discourses and P/CVE practices. Whilst civil society plays a crucial role in peacebuilding, research has also shown that they are entangled in a complex web of power relations. As intermediaries between the global, national, and local levels they engage in discursive practices that could both reinforce and contest dominant discourses and practices. This paper conceptualises these practices as occurring through multiple sites of power, where civil society acts as producers, consumers, targets, and beneficiaries of knowledge and practices. Within these subject positions, they negotiate with dominant (often eurocentric) discourses through strategies of vernacularisation , appropriation , and counterarguments . While these tactics may not entirely result in discursive shifts, they however open space for critical negotiation with dominant discourses which is a crucial step to resisting power structures.

Alternatives Global Local Political
Swansea University (GB), Dublin City University (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.