Does it work? Assessing the pragmatic validity of educational interventions: Empirical evidence and construct validation from the Indian academic sector

This research examines the pragmatic validity of educational interventions by developing a Personal Effectiveness Scale (PES) for university instructors in India and focusing on four constructs that are represented in Self-efficacy (SE), Time-Use Efficiency (TUE), Innovative Work Behavior (IWB), and Transformative Leadership (TL). The authors collected a sample of 300 university teachers across 27 universities. The construct was validated by implementing Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Also, Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) revealed that PES significantly predicts job satisfaction and teaching effectiveness, explaining 19% and 17.4% of the variance, respectively. IWB demonstrated the most substantial impact on job satisfaction (0.3527), while TUE was the most influential in teaching effectiveness (0.2598). The findings highlight critical areas such as mentorship deficiencies, high student-teacher ratios, and inadequate institutional support. The study provides a robust tool for assessing faculty effectiveness, contributing to ongoing efforts to improve the quality of higher education in India. Additionally, the research suggests improving professional development opportunities and implementing innovative teaching strategies to enhance academic performance. Future research should explore the PES scale’s cross-cultural applicability and institutional factors affecting personal effectiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v9i5.7478
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does it work? Assessing the pragmatic validity of educational interventions: Empirical evidence and construct validation from the Indian academic sector

Dina Sabry Said, Ariz Naqvi, Mujtaba Momin
Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
article

Does it work? Assessing the pragmatic validity of educational interventions: Empirical evidence and construct validation from the Indian academic sector

Dina Sabry Said, Ariz Naqvi, Mujtaba Momin
article en

Abstract

This research examines the pragmatic validity of educational interventions by developing a Personal Effectiveness Scale (PES) for university instructors in India and focusing on four constructs that are represented in Self-efficacy (SE), Time-Use Efficiency (TUE), Innovative Work Behavior (IWB), and Transformative Leadership (TL). The authors collected a sample of 300 university teachers across 27 universities. The construct was validated by implementing Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Also, Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) revealed that PES significantly predicts job satisfaction and teaching effectiveness, explaining 19% and 17.4% of the variance, respectively. IWB demonstrated the most substantial impact on job satisfaction (0.3527), while TUE was the most influential in teaching effectiveness (0.2598). The findings highlight critical areas such as mentorship deficiencies, high student-teacher ratios, and inadequate institutional support. The study provides a robust tool for assessing faculty effectiveness, contributing to ongoing efforts to improve the quality of higher education in India. Additionally, the research suggests improving professional development opportunities and implementing innovative teaching strategies to enhance academic performance. Future research should explore the PES scale’s cross-cultural applicability and institutional factors affecting personal effectiveness.

Edelweiss Applied Science and TechnologyVol. 9(5)
American University of the Middle East (KW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.