No wrap-up effect in Chinese reading: Evidence from eye movements

Research conducted on alphabetic languages has yielded findings suggesting that readers tend to allocate more time toward processing the final words of a sentence or clause, commonly referred to as the wrap-up effect. Several theoretical accounts of the wrap-up effect advocate causal mechanisms that are supposed to generalize over readers of all languages, yet they are based on a small selection of written languages and writing systems. Whether the wrap-up effect occurs in naturally unspaced, logographic languages such as Chinese remains unclear. We carried out an eye movement study focused on simplified Chinese reading, intending to discern whether the wrap-up effect at the end of the sentence is modulated by visual complexity. Native readers of Mandarin Chinese were tasked with reading sentences featuring target words manipulated in terms of visual complexity (high vs. low) and word position (final or medial) in the sentence. We found that words at the end of sentences were processed as quickly or even faster than those in the sentence-medial position, depending on the eye movement measure, and that the complexity of characters did not affect the wrap-up effect. This reversed or null wrap-up effect calls for a revision of proposed theoretical accounts grounded in the processing of alphabetic languages. The findings suggest that sentence processing in simplified Chinese is highly incremental, and the information-theoretical account is the one that does not contradict the observed direction of the wrap-up effect.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Published
2025-05-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218251347264
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Reading and Literacy Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

No wrap-up effect in Chinese reading: Evidence from eye movements

Yaqian Bao, Victor Kuperman, Jin Xue, G.L. Chen et al.
1 citations
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Reading and Literacy Development
3.44
article

No wrap-up effect in Chinese reading: Evidence from eye movements

Yaqian Bao, Victor Kuperman, Jin Xue, G.L. Chen, Dongcheng Xie
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Research conducted on alphabetic languages has yielded findings suggesting that readers tend to allocate more time toward processing the final words of a sentence or clause, commonly referred to as the wrap-up effect. Several theoretical accounts of the wrap-up effect advocate causal mechanisms that are supposed to generalize over readers of all languages, yet they are based on a small selection of written languages and writing systems. Whether the wrap-up effect occurs in naturally unspaced, logographic languages such as Chinese remains unclear. We carried out an eye movement study focused on simplified Chinese reading, intending to discern whether the wrap-up effect at the end of the sentence is modulated by visual complexity. Native readers of Mandarin Chinese were tasked with reading sentences featuring target words manipulated in terms of visual complexity (high vs. low) and word position (final or medial) in the sentence. We found that words at the end of sentences were processed as quickly or even faster than those in the sentence-medial position, depending on the eye movement measure, and that the complexity of characters did not affect the wrap-up effect. This reversed or null wrap-up effect calls for a revision of proposed theoretical accounts grounded in the processing of alphabetic languages. The findings suggest that sentence processing in simplified Chinese is highly incremental, and the information-theoretical account is the one that does not contradict the observed direction of the wrap-up effect.

Quarterly Journal of Experimental PsychologyVol. 79(3)
Beijing Institute of Technology (CN), University of Science and Technology Beijing (CN), McMaster University (CA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Reading and Literacy Development
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.