Proxies, Partners or Opponents?

Abstract In the last decade, the Western world has experienced a conspicuous shift from market liberalisation to market interventionism aimed at addressing the security-related shortcomings of economic interdependence. There is a growing body of literature exploring this “geoeconomic turn,” including the increasing state efforts to mobilize firms for economic statecraft. Yet, our understanding of state-business relationships in the era of geoeconomics remains fragmented and requires systematisation. This paper offers a typology of market actors engaged by states in geoeconomic competition. We do this by developing an analytical framework for classifying the engagement of businesses based on the two-scale matrix, where one scale shows the degree of embeddedness of a state into firm control, whereas the other scale represents the fit between companies and states’ interests. As a result, we develop a comprehensive typology of market actors engaged by states in geoeconomic competition – across assigned purposes, state embeddedness and types of control.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Law & Geoeconomics
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/29505720-bja00007
Primary Topic
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Proxies, Partners or Opponents?

Anna Vlasiuk Nibe, Olivier Schmitt
Law & Geoeconomics
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
article

Proxies, Partners or Opponents?

Anna Vlasiuk Nibe, Olivier Schmitt
article en

Abstract

Abstract In the last decade, the Western world has experienced a conspicuous shift from market liberalisation to market interventionism aimed at addressing the security-related shortcomings of economic interdependence. There is a growing body of literature exploring this “geoeconomic turn,” including the increasing state efforts to mobilize firms for economic statecraft. Yet, our understanding of state-business relationships in the era of geoeconomics remains fragmented and requires systematisation. This paper offers a typology of market actors engaged by states in geoeconomic competition. We do this by developing an analytical framework for classifying the engagement of businesses based on the two-scale matrix, where one scale shows the degree of embeddedness of a state into firm control, whereas the other scale represents the fit between companies and states’ interests. As a result, we develop a comprehensive typology of market actors engaged by states in geoeconomic competition – across assigned purposes, state embeddedness and types of control.

Law & GeoeconomicsVol. 1(1)
University of Southern Denmark (DK), Royal Danish Defence College (DK), Sygehus Sønderjylland (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Proxies, Partners or Opponents? — Anna Vlasiuk Nibe, Olivier Schmitt · Law & Geoeconomics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS