The “Other China” Identity of Imperial Vietnam (1400–1884)

Abstract Prior scholarship has generally understood imperial Vietnam’s dynasties as basing their statehood on a standalone identity built on a discrete Vietnamese culture. While acknowledging that Vietnamese courts appropriated certain names of China such as Zhongguo , scholars typically interpret the usage of such terms literally – that the Vietnamese dynasties attempted to portray themselves as a civilised, superior state. This article argues that this interpretation relies unduly on the lens of modern nation-state identities. When Vietnamese dynasties (1400–1885) appropriated names of China, the usage of many of these terms is incongruous with such literal interpretations. Rather, they were meant to claim ancient China’s identity for Vietnam. By examining such terminology, we demonstrate how Vietnamese courts envisioned Vietnam as the southern “twin” of a North—South “duality of Chinas”, alongside their northern neighbour. Vietnam’s subversive use of Chinese culture to justify political separation from its northern neighbour reflects attitudes toward Chinese identity common during periods of division in Chinese history.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Crossroads
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/26662523-bja10024
Primary Topic
Vietnamese History and Culture Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The “Other China” Identity of Imperial Vietnam (1400–1884)

Siew Han Chay, Alvin Lin
Crossroads
Vietnamese History and Culture Studies
article

The “Other China” Identity of Imperial Vietnam (1400–1884)

Siew Han Chay, Alvin Lin
article en

Abstract

Abstract Prior scholarship has generally understood imperial Vietnam’s dynasties as basing their statehood on a standalone identity built on a discrete Vietnamese culture. While acknowledging that Vietnamese courts appropriated certain names of China such as Zhongguo , scholars typically interpret the usage of such terms literally – that the Vietnamese dynasties attempted to portray themselves as a civilised, superior state. This article argues that this interpretation relies unduly on the lens of modern nation-state identities. When Vietnamese dynasties (1400–1885) appropriated names of China, the usage of many of these terms is incongruous with such literal interpretations. Rather, they were meant to claim ancient China’s identity for Vietnam. By examining such terminology, we demonstrate how Vietnamese courts envisioned Vietnam as the southern “twin” of a North—South “duality of Chinas”, alongside their northern neighbour. Vietnam’s subversive use of Chinese culture to justify political separation from its northern neighbour reflects attitudes toward Chinese identity common during periods of division in Chinese history.

CrossroadsVol. 23(2)
National University of Singapore (SG), Oldham Council (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Vietnamese History and Culture Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The “Other China” Identity of Imperial Vietnam (1400–1884) — Siew Han Chay, Alvin Lin · Crossroads (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS