Advances in modeling and optimization for two-photon lithography

BackgroundTwo-photon polymerization (TPP) is one of the most promising methods for the fabrication of metasurfaces due to its ability to create complex, high-resolution nanostructures. However, fabricating these structures using TPP is complex, and predicting the results of the fabrication process is challenging.AimWe aim to address these challenges by demonstrating how different modeling techniques can be employed to support the fabrication-aware design of metasurfaces.ApproachWe introduce and explore three modeling techniques: a simple threshold model, a compact model, and a full model of polymerization. Each model offers different levels of complexity and accuracy. We assess how well each model performs and what limitations they have, using practical examples to show how they can guide the fabrication process.ResultsOur comparison highlights the advantages and limitations of each modeling approach. The basic threshold model provides a general overview, focusing solely on the optical aspects and using a simple threshold for the photoresist. Thus, it lacks detailed descriptions of resist behavior. The compact model is semi-empirical, focusing on simplified chemical dynamics of a single species while including essential photochemical processes. By contrast, the full model of polymerization is the most advanced, offering a detailed description of various species involved in the process, such as monomers, polymers, and quenchers. Although it provides the most accurate predictions, it is also the most complex and computationally demanding.ConclusionsBy comparing these modeling approaches, we show that the decision on the most appropriate model depends on the specific requirements of the metasurface fabrication process. This analysis helps researchers and engineers determine the most suitable modeling approach for their work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Micro/Nanopatterning Materials and Metrology
Published
2025-05-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1117/1.jmm.24.2.023001
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advancements in Photolithography Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.46

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advances in modeling and optimization for two-photon lithography

Kevin Heggarty, Jonas Wiedenmann, Florie Ogor, Odysseas Tsilipakos et al.
2 citations
Journal of Micro/Nanopatterning Materials and Metrology
Advancements in Photolithography Techniques
1.46
article

Advances in modeling and optimization for two-photon lithography

Kevin Heggarty, Jonas Wiedenmann, Florie Ogor, Odysseas Tsilipakos, Andreas Erdmann, Joël Rovera, Valeriia Sedova
article en
2 citations

Abstract

BackgroundTwo-photon polymerization (TPP) is one of the most promising methods for the fabrication of metasurfaces due to its ability to create complex, high-resolution nanostructures. However, fabricating these structures using TPP is complex, and predicting the results of the fabrication process is challenging.AimWe aim to address these challenges by demonstrating how different modeling techniques can be employed to support the fabrication-aware design of metasurfaces.ApproachWe introduce and explore three modeling techniques: a simple threshold model, a compact model, and a full model of polymerization. Each model offers different levels of complexity and accuracy. We assess how well each model performs and what limitations they have, using practical examples to show how they can guide the fabrication process.ResultsOur comparison highlights the advantages and limitations of each modeling approach. The basic threshold model provides a general overview, focusing solely on the optical aspects and using a simple threshold for the photoresist. Thus, it lacks detailed descriptions of resist behavior. The compact model is semi-empirical, focusing on simplified chemical dynamics of a single species while including essential photochemical processes. By contrast, the full model of polymerization is the most advanced, offering a detailed description of various species involved in the process, such as monomers, polymers, and quenchers. Although it provides the most accurate predictions, it is also the most complex and computationally demanding.ConclusionsBy comparing these modeling approaches, we show that the decision on the most appropriate model depends on the specific requirements of the metasurface fabrication process. This analysis helps researchers and engineers determine the most suitable modeling approach for their work.

Journal of Micro/Nanopatterning Materials and MetrologyVol. 24(02)
IMT Atlantique (FR), National Hellenic Research Foundation (GR), Fraunhofer Institute for Integrated Systems and Device Technology (DE), Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas (GR)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Advancements in Photolithography Techniques
1.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.