A Multithreat Meta‐Analytic Database for Understanding Insect Biodiversity Change

ABSTRACT Aim Widespread declines in insect biodiversity have been attributed to a diverse set of anthropogenic drivers, but the relative importance of these drivers remains unclear. A key reason for this uncertainty is that their effects depend on many factors, such as taxonomy, geography, sampling method and the biodiversity metric considered. To better understand the relative impact of different drivers on insect biodiversity, effect sizes need to be anchored to major sources of heterogeneity and collected reproducibly through a structured and consistent protocol. This standardised approach will allow a quantitative synthesis of relative threats to insects, enabling more robust predictions of changes in insect biodiversity. Innovation Here we publish a global database of effect sizes that quantify the effect of 5 anthropogenic drivers on insect abundance, species richness, biomass and fecundity within the framework of the IUCN threat classification. While we only present results for a subset of major anthropogenic drivers and insect Orders, the database structure allows the addition of new studies for all major IUCN threats and insect Orders. Our current set of effect sizes was collated from 7 meta‐analyses, including 6308 effect sizes from 317 studies, focusing on threats ranked highly in an initial expert elicitation process. Data collection followed an overall meta‐protocol and a set of individual protocols tailored to each meta‐analysis. Our database provides a framework for the first global meta‐analytic overview of the response of insects to a range of major anthropogenic drivers. Main Conclusions Structured collation of both experimental and quasi‐experimental effect sizes, together with metadata that capture the main sources of heterogeneity, is needed to understand the effect of anthropogenic activity on insects. In turn, this understanding opens the way to predicting how we might expect insect biodiversity to have changed in the past and into the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diversity and Distributions
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.70025
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Species Distribution and Climate Change
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.68

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Multithreat Meta‐Analytic Database for Understanding Insect Biodiversity Change

Nick J. B. Isaac, Justin E. Isip, Joseph W. Millard, J. Iwan Jones et al.
2 citations
Diversity and Distributions
Species Distribution and Climate Change
3.68
article

A Multithreat Meta‐Analytic Database for Understanding Insect Biodiversity Change

Nick J. B. Isaac, Justin E. Isip, Joseph W. Millard, J. Iwan Jones, Charlotte L. Outhwaite, Lynn V. Dicks, Rob Cooke, Grace Skinner, Andrew J. Bladon, Andy Purvis, Ben A. Woodcock, Cang Hui, James G. Rodger, Cristina Raw, L. Philip Barnes, Junghyuk Keum, Emily Wenban‐Smith
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aim Widespread declines in insect biodiversity have been attributed to a diverse set of anthropogenic drivers, but the relative importance of these drivers remains unclear. A key reason for this uncertainty is that their effects depend on many factors, such as taxonomy, geography, sampling method and the biodiversity metric considered. To better understand the relative impact of different drivers on insect biodiversity, effect sizes need to be anchored to major sources of heterogeneity and collected reproducibly through a structured and consistent protocol. This standardised approach will allow a quantitative synthesis of relative threats to insects, enabling more robust predictions of changes in insect biodiversity. Innovation Here we publish a global database of effect sizes that quantify the effect of 5 anthropogenic drivers on insect abundance, species richness, biomass and fecundity within the framework of the IUCN threat classification. While we only present results for a subset of major anthropogenic drivers and insect Orders, the database structure allows the addition of new studies for all major IUCN threats and insect Orders. Our current set of effect sizes was collated from 7 meta‐analyses, including 6308 effect sizes from 317 studies, focusing on threats ranked highly in an initial expert elicitation process. Data collection followed an overall meta‐protocol and a set of individual protocols tailored to each meta‐analysis. Our database provides a framework for the first global meta‐analytic overview of the response of insects to a range of major anthropogenic drivers. Main Conclusions Structured collation of both experimental and quasi‐experimental effect sizes, together with metadata that capture the main sources of heterogeneity, is needed to understand the effect of anthropogenic activity on insects. In turn, this understanding opens the way to predicting how we might expect insect biodiversity to have changed in the past and into the future.

Diversity and DistributionsVol. 31(5)
Natural History Museum (GB), Queen Mary University of London (GB), University of Cambridge (GB), Stellenbosch University (ZA), UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (GB), University College London (GB), University of Reading (GB)
Leverhulme Trust, Cambridge Trust, Isaac Newton Trust, Natural Environment Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Species Distribution and Climate Change
3.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.