Process-Based Modeling of Furrow Irrigation Erosion

Furrow irrigation, one of the most widely used forms of irrigation in the world, may disproportionately contribute to water quality degradation. Accurate furrow erosion models are needed, but no satisfactory model exists. In this paper, we propose a process-based modeling framework by comparing two approaches: (1) the transport capacity (Tc) concept; and (2) a semiempirical approach in which furrow erodibility exponential decreases with length. Furrow erodibility kω was either assumed constant or exponentially decayed with time (dynamic erodibility). The best performance was obtained with the Tc approach when the dynamic kω was used (R2=0.68, Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency [NSE]=0.61, and percent bias [PBIAS]=–14.87% on evaluation data), whereas the semiempirical approach did not show any benefit of the dynamic kω (R2=0.69, NSE=0.65 and PBIAS=–21.93% at evaluation). The inability of the Tc model to account for deposition was found to be a key limitation of this approach. These process-based furrow erosion functions can be directly coupled with furrow flow routing or other hillslope erosion models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Published
2025-05-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jidedh.ireng-10540
Primary Topic
Soil erosion and sediment transport
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Process-Based Modeling of Furrow Irrigation Erosion

David L. Bjorneberg, Sayjro K. Nouwakpo, Bradley A. King
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Soil erosion and sediment transport
article

Process-Based Modeling of Furrow Irrigation Erosion

David L. Bjorneberg, Sayjro K. Nouwakpo, Bradley A. King
article en

Abstract

Furrow irrigation, one of the most widely used forms of irrigation in the world, may disproportionately contribute to water quality degradation. Accurate furrow erosion models are needed, but no satisfactory model exists. In this paper, we propose a process-based modeling framework by comparing two approaches: (1) the transport capacity (Tc) concept; and (2) a semiempirical approach in which furrow erodibility exponential decreases with length. Furrow erodibility kω was either assumed constant or exponentially decayed with time (dynamic erodibility). The best performance was obtained with the Tc approach when the dynamic kω was used (R2=0.68, Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency [NSE]=0.61, and percent bias [PBIAS]=–14.87% on evaluation data), whereas the semiempirical approach did not show any benefit of the dynamic kω (R2=0.69, NSE=0.65 and PBIAS=–21.93% at evaluation). The inability of the Tc model to account for deposition was found to be a key limitation of this approach. These process-based furrow erosion functions can be directly coupled with furrow flow routing or other hillslope erosion models.

Journal of Irrigation and Drainage EngineeringVol. 151(4)
Agricultural Research Service (US), United States Department of Agriculture (US), Northwest Irrigation and Soils Research Laboratory (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Soil erosion and sediment transport
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.