INTRA-RENAL INVOLVEMENT IN PRIMARY ANTIPHOSPHOLIPID ANTIBODIES SYNDROME: DATA FROM 2 ITALIAN CENTERS

PV020 / #573 Poster Topic: AS03 - Antiphospholipid Syndrome Background/Purpose Antiphospholipid antibodies nephropathy (aPL-N) is defined by thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) early lesions and late lesions such fibro-intimal hyperplasia with luminal obliteration/organized thrombi, fibrous arterial/arteriolar occlusion and focal cortical atrophy.[1] Beyond these distinct microvascular lesions, other glomerular conditions (membranous nephropathy, MN; focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, FSGS), were reported in primary APS (PAPS) patients, even without aPL-related vascular lesions. Objectives. 1) To evaluate clinical/laboratory features associated to intra-renal involvement in PAPS patients; 2) to clinically and histologically characterize PAPS patients with a) aPL-N and b) non-aPL-N intra-renal involvement. Methods Observational retrospective multicentric study including PAPS patients regularly followed (1984-2023). 1) Case-control study: PAPS patients with intra-renal involvement histologically confirmed vs PAPS patients without renal involvement signs. 2) Separate analysis according to renal histologic findings: a) aPL-N and b) non-aPL-N. Results Among 258 PAPS patients (78% females, median age at onset: 32 years, 67% thrombotic phenotype, 54% obstetric phenotype, 41% triple aPL+), 17 (7%) had histologically confirmed intra-renal involvement. It was the first disease manifestation in 10/17 (59%) patients, the main presentation was with isolated urinary abnormalities (IUAs) in 53% of the cases. At renal biopsy 35% had classic aPL-N injuries while 65% showed non-aPL-N intra-renal lesions. 1) Patients with intra-renal involvement suffered less macrovascular thrombotic events and more catastrophic APS (CAPS), thrombocytopenia, epilepsy, and lupus anticoagulant (LA)+ (Table 1). 2a) aPL-N was the first manifestation of APS in 5/6 (83%) cases, presenting with severe arterial hypertension in 17%, CAPS in 33% and IUAs in 50%. Despite therapy with anticoagulant (60%) or antiplatelet (40%) drugs in most patients, the 12-months renal response was complete in only 1/3 of the cases; half of the patients suffered subsequent aPL-related events (3/6 thrombocytopenia; 2/6 thrombotic events). 2b) PAPS patients with non-aPL-N intra-renal lesions had MN in 6/11 and FSGS in 5/11 cases, with some degree of non-specific vascular injury in 64%. As compared to patients with aPL-N, they presented more frequently normal serum creatinine and higher 24h-proteinuria levels (Figure 1) but no differences in systemic autoantibodies/complement levels. All the patients belonging to this subgroup experienced aPL-related events (8/11 thrombotic events, 5/6 obstetric events, 3/11 epilepsy, 2/11 heart valve lesions, 1/11 thrombocytopenia), that in 45% cases were preceded by the renal disease. Table 1. Continuous variables are presented as median (1st-3rd quartile) and compared with Mann-Whitney test; categorical variables are presented as number/number available data (%) and compared with Chi-square test/Fisher’s exact test. *= “extra-criteria” according to Sydney APS criteria 2006. Abbreviations: APS= antiphospholipid syndrome; aPL= antiphospholipid antibodies; LA= lupus anticoagulant; aCL= anticardiolipin antibodies. aβ2GPI= anti-beta2glycoproteinl antibodies; ANA= antinuclear antibodies. Figure 1. aPL-N vs non-aPL-N intra renal involvement: sCr= 1.9 [1.2-2.0] vs 0.98 [0.6-1.2] mg/dL; 24-hours proteinuria= 0.5 [0.4-0.5] vs 3.5 [1.9-3.9] g/24h. Conclusions The present work highlights the importance of conducting appropriate renal study in PAPS patients with renal biopsy, if needed, even in presence of mild IUAs. It underscores that aPL-N, being part of the peculiar microvascular APS subset, may require a treatment strategy beyond anticoagulation.[2] From nephrologists’ perspective, routinary screening for aPL during the assessment of glomerulopathies could be relevant, given the aPL prognostic role in the development of subsequent related events. References: [1.] Barbhaiya M. 2023. [2.] Erkan D. 2021.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Rheumatology
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.2025-0390.pv020
Primary Topic
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

INTRA-RENAL INVOLVEMENT IN PRIMARY ANTIPHOSPHOLIPID ANTIBODIES SYNDROME: DATA FROM 2 ITALIAN CENTERS

Dario Roccatello, Micaela Fredi, Savino Sciascia, Franco Franceschini et al.
The Journal of Rheumatology
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
article

INTRA-RENAL INVOLVEMENT IN PRIMARY ANTIPHOSPHOLIPID ANTIBODIES SYNDROME: DATA FROM 2 ITALIAN CENTERS

Dario Roccatello, Micaela Fredi, Savino Sciascia, Franco Franceschini, Cecilia Nalli, Federico Alberici, Liala Moschetti, Ilaria Cavazzana, Massimo Radin, Laura Andréoli, Anǵela Tincani, Stefania Affatato
article en

Abstract

PV020 / #573 Poster Topic: AS03 - Antiphospholipid Syndrome Background/Purpose Antiphospholipid antibodies nephropathy (aPL-N) is defined by thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) early lesions and late lesions such fibro-intimal hyperplasia with luminal obliteration/organized thrombi, fibrous arterial/arteriolar occlusion and focal cortical atrophy.[1] Beyond these distinct microvascular lesions, other glomerular conditions (membranous nephropathy, MN; focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, FSGS), were reported in primary APS (PAPS) patients, even without aPL-related vascular lesions. Objectives. 1) To evaluate clinical/laboratory features associated to intra-renal involvement in PAPS patients; 2) to clinically and histologically characterize PAPS patients with a) aPL-N and b) non-aPL-N intra-renal involvement. Methods Observational retrospective multicentric study including PAPS patients regularly followed (1984-2023). 1) Case-control study: PAPS patients with intra-renal involvement histologically confirmed vs PAPS patients without renal involvement signs. 2) Separate analysis according to renal histologic findings: a) aPL-N and b) non-aPL-N. Results Among 258 PAPS patients (78% females, median age at onset: 32 years, 67% thrombotic phenotype, 54% obstetric phenotype, 41% triple aPL+), 17 (7%) had histologically confirmed intra-renal involvement. It was the first disease manifestation in 10/17 (59%) patients, the main presentation was with isolated urinary abnormalities (IUAs) in 53% of the cases. At renal biopsy 35% had classic aPL-N injuries while 65% showed non-aPL-N intra-renal lesions. 1) Patients with intra-renal involvement suffered less macrovascular thrombotic events and more catastrophic APS (CAPS), thrombocytopenia, epilepsy, and lupus anticoagulant (LA)+ (Table 1). 2a) aPL-N was the first manifestation of APS in 5/6 (83%) cases, presenting with severe arterial hypertension in 17%, CAPS in 33% and IUAs in 50%. Despite therapy with anticoagulant (60%) or antiplatelet (40%) drugs in most patients, the 12-months renal response was complete in only 1/3 of the cases; half of the patients suffered subsequent aPL-related events (3/6 thrombocytopenia; 2/6 thrombotic events). 2b) PAPS patients with non-aPL-N intra-renal lesions had MN in 6/11 and FSGS in 5/11 cases, with some degree of non-specific vascular injury in 64%. As compared to patients with aPL-N, they presented more frequently normal serum creatinine and higher 24h-proteinuria levels (Figure 1) but no differences in systemic autoantibodies/complement levels. All the patients belonging to this subgroup experienced aPL-related events (8/11 thrombotic events, 5/6 obstetric events, 3/11 epilepsy, 2/11 heart valve lesions, 1/11 thrombocytopenia), that in 45% cases were preceded by the renal disease. Table 1. Continuous variables are presented as median (1st-3rd quartile) and compared with Mann-Whitney test; categorical variables are presented as number/number available data (%) and compared with Chi-square test/Fisher’s exact test. *= “extra-criteria” according to Sydney APS criteria 2006. Abbreviations: APS= antiphospholipid syndrome; aPL= antiphospholipid antibodies; LA= lupus anticoagulant; aCL= anticardiolipin antibodies. aβ2GPI= anti-beta2glycoproteinl antibodies; ANA= antinuclear antibodies. Figure 1. aPL-N vs non-aPL-N intra renal involvement: sCr= 1.9 [1.2-2.0] vs 0.98 [0.6-1.2] mg/dL; 24-hours proteinuria= 0.5 [0.4-0.5] vs 3.5 [1.9-3.9] g/24h. Conclusions The present work highlights the importance of conducting appropriate renal study in PAPS patients with renal biopsy, if needed, even in presence of mild IUAs. It underscores that aPL-N, being part of the peculiar microvascular APS subset, may require a treatment strategy beyond anticoagulation.[2] From nephrologists’ perspective, routinary screening for aPL during the assessment of glomerulopathies could be relevant, given the aPL prognostic role in the development of subsequent related events. References: [1.] Barbhaiya M. 2023. [2.] Erkan D. 2021.

The Journal of RheumatologyVol. 52(Suppl 1)
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia (IT), Ospedale San Giovanni Bosco (IT), University of Brescia (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.