Systematic Quality Assurance/Quality Control Framework for a Volatile Organic Compound Real-Time Monitoring Instrument, Autonomous Rugged Optical Multigas Analyzer for VOCs

This study presents a systematic quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) framework for new technology adopters to validate environmental monitoring instruments when consistent, standardized validation and calibration procedures do not readily exist. This QA/QC framework is especially relevant for newly developed environmental monitoring instruments prior to deployment in field settings as part of environmental site investigations. Key QA/QC parameters used in the framework include repeatability, intermediate precision, reproducibility, linearity, limits of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ), trueness, and recovery. The QA/QC framework is demonstrated on the autonomous rugged optical multigas analyzer for VOCs (AROMA-VOC), a technology that employs cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS) with preconcentration and chromatographic separation prior to CRDS detection. QA/QC protocols for nine VOCs, and results for AROMA-VOC were compared with laboratory-based gas chromatography/mass spectrometer (GC-MS). Results demonstrated high linearity (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> > 0.95) and low LOQ values (0.0004 ± 0.0002-0.0455 ± 0.0192 μg/L). The instrument also exhibited ranges of LOD at least an order of magnitude lower than that of the referenced GC-MS. AROMA-VOC demonstrated acceptable precision [repeatability, intraday relative standard deviation (RSD %): 1.72-12.1%; intermediate, interday RSD %: 2.01-10.93%] and substantial recovery (104.8% to 212.4%). Interlaboratory testing also concluded that AROMA-VOC can produce consistent detections (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> > 0.90). The <i>z</i>-score findings suggested that the performance of the instrument was satisfactory, with the exceptions of xylenes and 1,3-butadiene. Overall, using the systematic QA/QC framework presented in this study, AROMA-VOC is shown to be a robust method for volatile organic compound analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Omega
Published
2025-05-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.4c10634
Primary Topic
Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systematic Quality Assurance/Quality Control Framework for a Volatile Organic Compound Real-Time Monitoring Instrument, Autonomous Rugged Optical Multigas Analyzer for VOCs

Kelly G. Pennell, Hunter Moseley, A. Z. Miller, Lila Beckley et al.
ACS Omega
Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
article

Systematic Quality Assurance/Quality Control Framework for a Volatile Organic Compound Real-Time Monitoring Instrument, Autonomous Rugged Optical Multigas Analyzer for VOCs

Kelly G. Pennell, Hunter Moseley, A. Z. Miller, Lila Beckley, Hong Cheng Tay
article en

Abstract

This study presents a systematic quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) framework for new technology adopters to validate environmental monitoring instruments when consistent, standardized validation and calibration procedures do not readily exist. This QA/QC framework is especially relevant for newly developed environmental monitoring instruments prior to deployment in field settings as part of environmental site investigations. Key QA/QC parameters used in the framework include repeatability, intermediate precision, reproducibility, linearity, limits of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ), trueness, and recovery. The QA/QC framework is demonstrated on the autonomous rugged optical multigas analyzer for VOCs (AROMA-VOC), a technology that employs cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS) with preconcentration and chromatographic separation prior to CRDS detection. QA/QC protocols for nine VOCs, and results for AROMA-VOC were compared with laboratory-based gas chromatography/mass spectrometer (GC-MS). Results demonstrated high linearity (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> > 0.95) and low LOQ values (0.0004 ± 0.0002-0.0455 ± 0.0192 μg/L). The instrument also exhibited ranges of LOD at least an order of magnitude lower than that of the referenced GC-MS. AROMA-VOC demonstrated acceptable precision [repeatability, intraday relative standard deviation (RSD %): 1.72-12.1%; intermediate, interday RSD %: 2.01-10.93%] and substantial recovery (104.8% to 212.4%). Interlaboratory testing also concluded that AROMA-VOC can produce consistent detections (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> > 0.90). The <i>z</i>-score findings suggested that the performance of the instrument was satisfactory, with the exceptions of xylenes and 1,3-butadiene. Overall, using the systematic QA/QC framework presented in this study, AROMA-VOC is shown to be a robust method for volatile organic compound analysis.

ACS OmegaVol. 10(22)
University of Kentucky (US), Entanglement Technologies (United States) (US), GSI Environmental (United States) (US)
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.