Forest fragmentation in the Brazilian Amazon: Trends and conservation strategies

• Amazon forest fragmentation shows an increase in fragments and reduction in size in three decades. • The Amazon's fragmentation trajectory shifts from Core to Connector to Background. • Central Amazon demands target conservation to avoid fragmentation like Eastern Amazon. • Secondary forest may be used to reverse fragmentation. • Fragmentation metrics and trajectory nourish conservation actions. Tropical forests have experienced increasing fragmentation. The trajectory of forest fragmentation (sequence, permanence, and location) offers valuable insights for shaping environmental strategies. We examined fragmentation trends and metrics in the Brazilian Amazon over a 34-year period, encompassing its macroregions: Western (WA), Central (CA), and Eastern Amazon (EA). The findings reveal an ongoing fragmentation, characterized by an increase in fragment numbers (WA: +37%, from 49,871 to 68,067 fragments; CA: +82%, 72,463–132,051 fragments; EA: +178%, 164,249–456,399 fragments) and a reduction in mean fragment size (WA: −28%, from 2825.7–2036.8 ha; CA: −48%, 1747.4–905.4 ha; EA: −75%, 651.8–162.3 ha), particularly in the east. Transitions occurred across few forest classes, typically, from forest Core to connecting forest, and eventually to anthropogenic areas. The Core class's permanence was longest in WA (32 years), while anthropogenic areas had the highest permanence in EA (7.6 years) and the lowest in WA (<1 year). Intermediate fragmentation classes were more prevalent in EA, which also demonstrated higher entropy. CA requires immediate attention actions from decision-makers to prevent the intense fragmentation shown in EA. We suggested strategies to mitigate Amazon fragmentation, emphasizing integrated metrics and region-specific approaches for enhanced connectivity and reduced forest loss.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2025.04.001
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Forest fragmentation in the Brazilian Amazon: Trends and conservation strategies

Felipe Lenti, Pedro Trejo, Cláudia Azevedo-Ramos
2 citations
Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
2.21
article

Forest fragmentation in the Brazilian Amazon: Trends and conservation strategies

Felipe Lenti, Pedro Trejo, Cláudia Azevedo-Ramos
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• Amazon forest fragmentation shows an increase in fragments and reduction in size in three decades. • The Amazon's fragmentation trajectory shifts from Core to Connector to Background. • Central Amazon demands target conservation to avoid fragmentation like Eastern Amazon. • Secondary forest may be used to reverse fragmentation. • Fragmentation metrics and trajectory nourish conservation actions. Tropical forests have experienced increasing fragmentation. The trajectory of forest fragmentation (sequence, permanence, and location) offers valuable insights for shaping environmental strategies. We examined fragmentation trends and metrics in the Brazilian Amazon over a 34-year period, encompassing its macroregions: Western (WA), Central (CA), and Eastern Amazon (EA). The findings reveal an ongoing fragmentation, characterized by an increase in fragment numbers (WA: +37%, from 49,871 to 68,067 fragments; CA: +82%, 72,463–132,051 fragments; EA: +178%, 164,249–456,399 fragments) and a reduction in mean fragment size (WA: −28%, from 2825.7–2036.8 ha; CA: −48%, 1747.4–905.4 ha; EA: −75%, 651.8–162.3 ha), particularly in the east. Transitions occurred across few forest classes, typically, from forest Core to connecting forest, and eventually to anthropogenic areas. The Core class's permanence was longest in WA (32 years), while anthropogenic areas had the highest permanence in EA (7.6 years) and the lowest in WA (<1 year). Intermediate fragmentation classes were more prevalent in EA, which also demonstrated higher entropy. CA requires immediate attention actions from decision-makers to prevent the intense fragmentation shown in EA. We suggested strategies to mitigate Amazon fragmentation, emphasizing integrated metrics and region-specific approaches for enhanced connectivity and reduced forest loss.

Perspectives in Ecology and ConservationVol. 23(2)
Universidade da Amazônia (BR), Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazônia (BR), Universidade Federal do Pará (BR)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.