EVALUATING BIO-CEMENTATION INJECTION TECHNIQUES FOR SILICA SAND: DURATION, DISTRIBUTION, AND STRENGTH ENHANCEMENT

Challenges frequently encountered in research on loose sand improvements through the use of microbial-induced calcite precipitation (MICP) include the non-uniformity of cemented products and blocking in the vicinity of the injection pipe.One of the most important factors influencing MICP's success is the injection method.In this study, three bio-cementation injection methods using Sporosarcina pasteurii bacteria were compared on silica sand samples in the laboratory.The aim was to assess the performance of each injection method in terms of time efficiency, cementation product distribution, and comparison in soil shear strength before and after cementation.The employed injection techniques encompassed direct mixing (DM) injection, two-phase (TP) injection, and modified stage (MS) injection.The findings indicated that none of the three injection methods yielded ideal outcomes in all aspects.The MS injection produced the most cemented volume by 57.5%.However, no strength increases were observed, as evidenced by the hybrid sample's internal friction angle () of 31.72, which was similar to that of uncemented sand.Conversely, the DM injection produced the largest improvement in shear strength with a 46.416 value, although cementation was limited to the upper half of the sample by 52.4% volume.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Geomate
Published
2025-05-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21660/2025.129.4855
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Microbial Applications in Construction Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EVALUATING BIO-CEMENTATION INJECTION TECHNIQUES FOR SILICA SAND: DURATION, DISTRIBUTION, AND STRENGTH ENHANCEMENT

Rangga Adiprima Sudisman
2 citations
International Journal of Geomate
Microbial Applications in Construction Materials
1.60
article

EVALUATING BIO-CEMENTATION INJECTION TECHNIQUES FOR SILICA SAND: DURATION, DISTRIBUTION, AND STRENGTH ENHANCEMENT

Rangga Adiprima Sudisman
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Challenges frequently encountered in research on loose sand improvements through the use of microbial-induced calcite precipitation (MICP) include the non-uniformity of cemented products and blocking in the vicinity of the injection pipe.One of the most important factors influencing MICP's success is the injection method.In this study, three bio-cementation injection methods using Sporosarcina pasteurii bacteria were compared on silica sand samples in the laboratory.The aim was to assess the performance of each injection method in terms of time efficiency, cementation product distribution, and comparison in soil shear strength before and after cementation.The employed injection techniques encompassed direct mixing (DM) injection, two-phase (TP) injection, and modified stage (MS) injection.The findings indicated that none of the three injection methods yielded ideal outcomes in all aspects.The MS injection produced the most cemented volume by 57.5%.However, no strength increases were observed, as evidenced by the hybrid sample's internal friction angle () of 31.72, which was similar to that of uncemented sand.Conversely, the DM injection produced the largest improvement in shear strength with a 46.416 value, although cementation was limited to the upper half of the sample by 52.4% volume.

International Journal of GeomateVol. 28(129)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Microbial Applications in Construction Materials
1.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.