Lead Independent Directors and Corporate Tax Policy

ABSTRACT Companies voluntarily adopt lead independent directors (LIDs) for the benefits they could bring to the board, such as further improving board independence, mitigating unresolved agency issues, enhancing board monitoring, and countering criticisms of corporate governance. We find that companies with LIDs have more conservative tax policies. The influence of LIDs on corporate tax policies is greater when the level of tax avoidance is more aggressive compared to their size and industry peers. We also find that investors favorably value the more conservative tax policies of companies with LIDs. Companies with LIDs have lower tax risk, pursue more conservative tax planning, such as lower UTB settlements, and are less likely to use tax shelters. These companies do not have aggressive valuation allowance releases and have fewer permanent book‐tax differences. Lastly, we also find an associated non‐tax benefit: CEOs in companies with LIDs do not have a higher likelihood of subsequent forced turnover for not engaging in tax avoidance. Thus, he investors’ higher valuation of more conservative corporate tax policies reduces the likelihood of subsequent forced CEO turnover.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Business Finance &amp Accounting
Published
2025-05-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12878
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lead Independent Directors and Corporate Tax Policy

Thomas C. Omer, Bo Gao
1 citations
Journal of Business Finance &amp Accounting
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
3.91
article

Lead Independent Directors and Corporate Tax Policy

Thomas C. Omer, Bo Gao
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Companies voluntarily adopt lead independent directors (LIDs) for the benefits they could bring to the board, such as further improving board independence, mitigating unresolved agency issues, enhancing board monitoring, and countering criticisms of corporate governance. We find that companies with LIDs have more conservative tax policies. The influence of LIDs on corporate tax policies is greater when the level of tax avoidance is more aggressive compared to their size and industry peers. We also find that investors favorably value the more conservative tax policies of companies with LIDs. Companies with LIDs have lower tax risk, pursue more conservative tax planning, such as lower UTB settlements, and are less likely to use tax shelters. These companies do not have aggressive valuation allowance releases and have fewer permanent book‐tax differences. Lastly, we also find an associated non‐tax benefit: CEOs in companies with LIDs do not have a higher likelihood of subsequent forced turnover for not engaging in tax avoidance. Thus, he investors’ higher valuation of more conservative corporate tax policies reduces the likelihood of subsequent forced CEO turnover.

Journal of Business Finance &amp AccountingVol. 52(4)
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US), The University of Texas at El Paso (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
3.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.