Disinformation and Legal Responsibility: Regulating Digital Speech Without Curtailing Dissent

This study aims to explore how legal systems and digital platforms can regulate disinformation in online environments without infringing upon the right to dissent and freedom of expression. A narrative review design using a descriptive analysis method was employed to examine international human rights instruments, national legal frameworks, landmark case law, and platform governance models related to disinformation regulation. Academic journal articles, legal documents, institutional reports, and policy papers published between 2020 and 2024 were selected through targeted database searches. The analysis focused on key themes such as the misuse of disinformation laws to suppress dissent, the role of digital platforms in moderating speech, and the legal ambiguities surrounding definitions of harm and intent. The study found that while many jurisdictions have developed legal tools to counteract disinformation, these tools often suffer from vagueness and overbreadth, creating risks for democratic dissent. International legal standards provide foundational protections for freedom of speech, but their domestic implementation varies, sometimes resulting in overregulation or abuse. Case studies reveal that anti-disinformation laws have been used in several countries to target journalists, activists, and political opponents. Moreover, global digital platforms play a central role in moderating content but often operate with insufficient transparency and accountability. The analysis also highlights the challenges of jurisdictional conflicts, definitional ambiguities, and the complexities of establishing legal responsibility in a decentralized digital space. Effective regulation of disinformation must strike a balance between mitigating informational harm and preserving democratic freedoms. Legal and platform-based approaches must be rooted in clear definitions, proportional measures, and independent oversight to prevent misuse and ensure accountability. Enhancing media literacy and civic engagement is also essential to building public resilience against disinformation while protecting the legitimacy of dissenting voices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.isslp.4.2.26
Primary Topic
Law, Rights, and Freedoms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disinformation and Legal Responsibility: Regulating Digital Speech Without Curtailing Dissent

Ivan Petrov, Rajeev Kumar
Law, Rights, and Freedoms
article

Disinformation and Legal Responsibility: Regulating Digital Speech Without Curtailing Dissent

Ivan Petrov, Rajeev Kumar
article en

Abstract

This study aims to explore how legal systems and digital platforms can regulate disinformation in online environments without infringing upon the right to dissent and freedom of expression. A narrative review design using a descriptive analysis method was employed to examine international human rights instruments, national legal frameworks, landmark case law, and platform governance models related to disinformation regulation. Academic journal articles, legal documents, institutional reports, and policy papers published between 2020 and 2024 were selected through targeted database searches. The analysis focused on key themes such as the misuse of disinformation laws to suppress dissent, the role of digital platforms in moderating speech, and the legal ambiguities surrounding definitions of harm and intent. The study found that while many jurisdictions have developed legal tools to counteract disinformation, these tools often suffer from vagueness and overbreadth, creating risks for democratic dissent. International legal standards provide foundational protections for freedom of speech, but their domestic implementation varies, sometimes resulting in overregulation or abuse. Case studies reveal that anti-disinformation laws have been used in several countries to target journalists, activists, and political opponents. Moreover, global digital platforms play a central role in moderating content but often operate with insufficient transparency and accountability. The analysis also highlights the challenges of jurisdictional conflicts, definitional ambiguities, and the complexities of establishing legal responsibility in a decentralized digital space. Effective regulation of disinformation must strike a balance between mitigating informational harm and preserving democratic freedoms. Legal and platform-based approaches must be rooted in clear definitions, proportional measures, and independent oversight to prevent misuse and ensure accountability. Enhancing media literacy and civic engagement is also essential to building public resilience against disinformation while protecting the legitimacy of dissenting voices.

Vol. 4(2)
University of Delhi (IN), Sofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski" (BG), National Law University, Delhi (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Law, Rights, and Freedoms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.