Open-Science Training in American Psychological Association–Accredited Clinical-Psychology Programs: A Registered Report
In the present study, completed as a Registered Report, we assessed the level of training on issues related to open science and the replication crisis in clinical-psychology PhD programs in the United States. Syllabi were surveyed and coded from research-methods courses in these programs for topics related to open science and the replication crisis. In addition, a survey of graduate students was conducted evaluating their exposure to and opinions of open science and the replication crisis. We found that overall, open-science and replication-crisis topics are not widely covered in these programs, although there is evidence of students’ interest in learning about these topics.
Authors
- Donald R. Lynam (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8306-498X)
- Kaela Van Til (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6939-8796)
- Tianwei V. Du (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0603-1353)
- Joshua D. Miller (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1280-2863)
- Leigha Rose (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1431-476X)
- Nathaniel Luke Phillips (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0347-0449)
Institutions
- University of Georgia (US)
- Stanford University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Clinical Psychological Science
- Published
- 2025-05-24
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026251331550
- Primary Topic
- Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00