Open-Science Training in American Psychological Association–Accredited Clinical-Psychology Programs: A Registered Report

In the present study, completed as a Registered Report, we assessed the level of training on issues related to open science and the replication crisis in clinical-psychology PhD programs in the United States. Syllabi were surveyed and coded from research-methods courses in these programs for topics related to open science and the replication crisis. In addition, a survey of graduate students was conducted evaluating their exposure to and opinions of open science and the replication crisis. We found that overall, open-science and replication-crisis topics are not widely covered in these programs, although there is evidence of students’ interest in learning about these topics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Psychological Science
Published
2025-05-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026251331550
Primary Topic
Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Open-Science Training in American Psychological Association–Accredited Clinical-Psychology Programs: A Registered Report

Donald R. Lynam, Kaela Van Til, Tianwei V. Du, Joshua D. Miller et al.
1 links
Clinical Psychological Science
Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
article

Open-Science Training in American Psychological Association–Accredited Clinical-Psychology Programs: A Registered Report

Donald R. Lynam, Kaela Van Til, Tianwei V. Du, Joshua D. Miller, Leigha Rose, Nathaniel Luke Phillips
article en

Abstract

In the present study, completed as a Registered Report, we assessed the level of training on issues related to open science and the replication crisis in clinical-psychology PhD programs in the United States. Syllabi were surveyed and coded from research-methods courses in these programs for topics related to open science and the replication crisis. In addition, a survey of graduate students was conducted evaluating their exposure to and opinions of open science and the replication crisis. We found that overall, open-science and replication-crisis topics are not widely covered in these programs, although there is evidence of students’ interest in learning about these topics.

Clinical Psychological ScienceVol. 13(6)
University of Georgia (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Open-Science Training in American Psychological Association–Accredited Clinical-Psychology Programs: A Registered Report — Donald R. Lynam, Kaela Van Til, et al. · Clinical Psychological Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS