Seismicity Patterns and Multi‐Scale Imaging of Krafla, N–E Iceland, With Local Earthquake Tomography

Abstract Krafla, one of five central volcanoes of the Northern Volcanic Zone in Iceland, is utilized for geothermal energy production. Due to scientific and industrial interests, the volcano and its geothermal system have been imaged and monitored with various geophysical methods over the last decades leading to a better knowledge of its complex geological setting. Nonetheless, the unexpected encounter of magma at relatively shallow depths during drilling of the IDDP‐1 well in 2009 proved that imaging small‐scale structures remains challenging in such heterogeneous geological settings. With data from a local permanent 12 station seismic network owned by Landsvirkjun and operated by Iceland GeoSurvey since 2013, and a dense temporary network of 98 seismic nodes deployed for one month in 2022 in the center of Krafla caldera, we conducted a multi‐scale analysis based on local earthquake tomography. This analysis enables us to identify small‐scale velocity structures and improve earthquake locations. The newly obtained high‐resolution 3D models for P‐ and S‐wave velocities offer a glimpse into the subsurface structure of the volcanic system with both wave types being responsive to distinct rock/fluid properties. The relocated seismic activity highlights active structures pinpointed through the tomography, in particular the seismogenic zone at the boundary of high to low ratios, close to where magma was repeatedly encountered. By comparing the newly obtained high‐resolution velocity models with available well log data, such as formation temperature, we aim to enhance the understanding of the interconnected volcanic and geothermal systems in areas lacking in situ measurements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024jb030425
Citations
3
Primary Topic
earthquake and tectonic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Seismicity Patterns and Multi‐Scale Imaging of Krafla, N–E Iceland, With Local Earthquake Tomography

Þorbjörg Ágústsdóttir, Titouan Muzellec, Anette K. Mortensen, Egill Árni Guðnason et al.
3 citations
Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
earthquake and tectonic studies
5.60
article

Seismicity Patterns and Multi‐Scale Imaging of Krafla, N–E Iceland, With Local Earthquake Tomography

Þorbjörg Ágústsdóttir, Titouan Muzellec, Anette K. Mortensen, Egill Árni Guðnason, Stéphane Garambois, Jean Vandemeulebrouck, J. Virieux, Elisabeth Glück
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Krafla, one of five central volcanoes of the Northern Volcanic Zone in Iceland, is utilized for geothermal energy production. Due to scientific and industrial interests, the volcano and its geothermal system have been imaged and monitored with various geophysical methods over the last decades leading to a better knowledge of its complex geological setting. Nonetheless, the unexpected encounter of magma at relatively shallow depths during drilling of the IDDP‐1 well in 2009 proved that imaging small‐scale structures remains challenging in such heterogeneous geological settings. With data from a local permanent 12 station seismic network owned by Landsvirkjun and operated by Iceland GeoSurvey since 2013, and a dense temporary network of 98 seismic nodes deployed for one month in 2022 in the center of Krafla caldera, we conducted a multi‐scale analysis based on local earthquake tomography. This analysis enables us to identify small‐scale velocity structures and improve earthquake locations. The newly obtained high‐resolution 3D models for P‐ and S‐wave velocities offer a glimpse into the subsurface structure of the volcanic system with both wave types being responsive to distinct rock/fluid properties. The relocated seismic activity highlights active structures pinpointed through the tomography, in particular the seismogenic zone at the boundary of high to low ratios, close to where magma was repeatedly encountered. By comparing the newly obtained high‐resolution velocity models with available well log data, such as formation temperature, we aim to enhance the understanding of the interconnected volcanic and geothermal systems in areas lacking in situ measurements.

Journal of Geophysical Research Solid EarthVol. 130(5)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Landsvirkjun (Iceland) (IS), Iceland GeoSurvey (IS), Institut des Sciences de la Terre (FR), Université Gustave Eiffel (FR), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR), Université Savoie Mont Blanc (FR), University of Naples Federico II (IT), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
Landsvirkjun, European Commission, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
earthquake and tectonic studies
5.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.