Comprehensive Analysis of FOC, MPC, and DTC Controlling Methods for Five-Phase Induction Motor Drives using Two-Level and Three-Level Inverters

Abstract: This study provides a thorough examination of Direct Torque Control (DTC), Model Predictive Control (MPC), and Field-Oriented Control (FOC) for five-phase induction motor (FPIM) drives. The study examines how well these control strategies work with inverters that have two and three levels. Several performance metrics are examined through simulation and hardware results, such as fault tolerance, dynamic response, torque ripple, and computational complexity. The findings show that while DTC offers a faster response with a larger torque ripple, MPC offers better dynamic performance at a higher computational cost. Even though FOC is computationally efficient, its response times are slower. Three-level inverters decrease switching losses and total harmonic distortion (THD) while improving the quality of the voltage waveform.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology
Published
2025-05-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2025.71310
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Multilevel Inverters and Converters
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comprehensive Analysis of FOC, MPC, and DTC Controlling Methods for Five-Phase Induction Motor Drives using Two-Level and Three-Level Inverters

Mukesh Kumar
3 citations
International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology
Multilevel Inverters and Converters
2.19
article

Comprehensive Analysis of FOC, MPC, and DTC Controlling Methods for Five-Phase Induction Motor Drives using Two-Level and Three-Level Inverters

Mukesh Kumar
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract: This study provides a thorough examination of Direct Torque Control (DTC), Model Predictive Control (MPC), and Field-Oriented Control (FOC) for five-phase induction motor (FPIM) drives. The study examines how well these control strategies work with inverters that have two and three levels. Several performance metrics are examined through simulation and hardware results, such as fault tolerance, dynamic response, torque ripple, and computational complexity. The findings show that while DTC offers a faster response with a larger torque ripple, MPC offers better dynamic performance at a higher computational cost. Even though FOC is computationally efficient, its response times are slower. Three-level inverters decrease switching losses and total harmonic distortion (THD) while improving the quality of the voltage waveform.

International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering TechnologyVol. 13(5)
Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Petroleum Technology (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Multilevel Inverters and Converters
2.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.