Six solutions for clinical study data sharing in Germany

Sharing clinical study data is endorsed by many funders and journals, international policy frameworks, and patients. Reuse of clinical study data demonstrably improves health research, and emerging technologies may enhance the value derived from shared data. Unfortunately, clinical research has failed to harness the transformative power of data sharing, and sharing remains the exception. This opinion piece focuses on the massive obstacles to sharing clinical study data in Germany, which results in very low sharing rates, wasted resources, and frustration among local researchers and international partners. We argue that this sharing crisis demands immediate and concerted action. As a remedy, we propose six feasible steps to boost clinical study data availability in Germany, derived from our experience consulting researchers and exploring solutions with international partners. Our recommendations target ethics committees, trial registries, infrastructures, and governance, while addressing data protection concerns. These measures must be flanked by further actions to foster data sharing skills and knowledge as well as, most importantly, the provision of appropriate incentives. Nevertheless, the proposed changes would be a breakthrough for clinical study data sharing in Germany, removing barriers regarding infrastructures, awareness, legal uncertainty, and responsibilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Published
2025-05-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-025-02560-y
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.76

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Six solutions for clinical study data sharing in Germany

René Bernard, Tracey L. Weissgerber, Evgeny Bobrov, Daniel Strech et al.
2 citations
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Ethics in Clinical Research
3.76
article

Six solutions for clinical study data sharing in Germany

René Bernard, Tracey L. Weissgerber, Evgeny Bobrov, Daniel Strech, Christina Habermehl
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Sharing clinical study data is endorsed by many funders and journals, international policy frameworks, and patients. Reuse of clinical study data demonstrably improves health research, and emerging technologies may enhance the value derived from shared data. Unfortunately, clinical research has failed to harness the transformative power of data sharing, and sharing remains the exception. This opinion piece focuses on the massive obstacles to sharing clinical study data in Germany, which results in very low sharing rates, wasted resources, and frustration among local researchers and international partners. We argue that this sharing crisis demands immediate and concerted action. As a remedy, we propose six feasible steps to boost clinical study data availability in Germany, derived from our experience consulting researchers and exploring solutions with international partners. Our recommendations target ethics committees, trial registries, infrastructures, and governance, while addressing data protection concerns. These measures must be flanked by further actions to foster data sharing skills and knowledge as well as, most importantly, the provision of appropriate incentives. Nevertheless, the proposed changes would be a breakthrough for clinical study data sharing in Germany, removing barriers regarding infrastructures, awareness, legal uncertainty, and responsibilities.

BMC Medical Research MethodologyVol. 25(1)
Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (DE), Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Universität Wien, Medizinische Universität Wien, Universität Rostock
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Ethics in Clinical Research
3.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.