Summary measures in non-inferiority clinical trials with a time-to-event outcome: an empirical comparison of power
Our results empirically corroborate the theoretical advantage of difference in restricted mean survival time over the hazard ratio and difference in survival in non-inferiority clinical trials. This advantage is most apparent when estimation is done under proportional hazards. Choosing a relevant time point at which to evaluate the survival-based summary measures is an important aspect that should be carefully considered. We recommend incorporation of the difference in restricted mean survival time in the design and analysis of non-inferiority clinical trials when clinically justifiable. If appropriate, estimation under proportional hazards is preferable.
Authors
- Marta Fiocco (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5588-0277)
- Matteo Quartagno (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4446-0730)
- Shole D.L. Broer
- Ian R. White (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6718-7661)
- Isabelle R. Weir (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5098-0671)
- Tim P. Morris (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5850-3610)
Institutions
- Leiden University (NL)
- Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL (GB)
- Edwards Lifesciences (United States) (US)
- University College London (GB)
- Edwards Lifesciences (Switzerland) (CH)
Publication Details
- Journal
- BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Published
- 2025-05-24
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-025-02576-4
- Primary Topic
- Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00