International Consensus Guideline on Delineation of the Clinical Target Volumes at Different Dose Levels for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (2024 Version)

Amidst the challenges of diverging practices, a comprehensive consensus guideline has been devised based on updated evidence and collective agreement among international experts. This serves as a practical reference for optimal target coverage at different dose levels to maximize locoregional control while minimizing toxicities and guiding principles for generating automated contouring programs to enhance standardization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
Published
2025-05-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.05.019
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

International Consensus Guideline on Delineation of the Clinical Target Volumes at Different Dose Levels for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (2024 Version)

Johannes A. Langendijk, Joseph Wee, Kenneth Jensen, William M. Mendenhall et al.
9 citations
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
16.63
article

International Consensus Guideline on Delineation of the Clinical Target Volumes at Different Dose Levels for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (2024 Version)

Johannes A. Langendijk, Joseph Wee, Kenneth Jensen, William M. Mendenhall, Hai‐Qiang Mai, Quynh‐Thu Le, Anne W.M. Lee, James Chung Hang Chow, June Corry, Qiaojuan Guo, Enis Özyar, David I. Rosenthal, Wai Tong Ng, Jin‐Ching Lin, Junlin Yi, Yungan Tao, Nancy Y. Lee, Annie W. Chan, Rensheng Wang, Jianji Pan, Zhiyuan Xu, Kevin Joseph Harrington, Melvin L.K. Chua, Sue S. Yom, Shaojun Lin, Vincent Grégoire, Yong Chan Ahn, Fei Han, Qin Liu, Daiming Fan, Victor Lee, Jun Ma, Chaosu Hu, Brian O’Sullivan, Hussain AlHussain
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Amidst the challenges of diverging practices, a comprehensive consensus guideline has been devised based on updated evidence and collective agreement among international experts. This serves as a practical reference for optimal target coverage at different dose levels to maximize locoregional control while minimizing toxicities and guiding principles for generating automated contouring programs to enhance standardization.

International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*PhysicsVol. 123(2)
Fujian Medical University (CN), University Medical Center Groningen (NL), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), Harvard University (US), Institute of Cancer Research (GB), National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (TW), Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Guangxi Medical University (CN), University of Groningen (NL), University of California, San Francisco (US), University of Toronto (CA), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), China Association for Science and Technology (CN), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Genesis HealthCare (US), Institut Gustave Roussy (FR), King Fahd Medical City (SA), Samsung Medical Center (KR), Aarhus University Hospital (DK), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (CA), Acıbadem University (TR), University of Florida (US), St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne (AU), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Institute of Cancer Research (CA), Taichung Veterans General Hospital (TW), Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (CN), Centre Léon Bérard (FR), Royal Marsden Hospital (GB), First Affiliated Hospital of GuangXi Medical University (CN), National Cancer Centre Singapore (SG), University of Hong Kong - Shenzhen Hospital (CN), Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (CN), Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital (CN), Chinese Anti-Cancer Association (CN), Queen Elizabeth Hospital (CN), Sungkyunkwan University (KR), University of Hong Kong (HK), Florida College (US), National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (TW), Stanford University (US)
Bristol-Myers Squibb, Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists, Seagen, European Commission, Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen, EMD Serono, Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
16.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.