A decision-making framework for supporting an equitable global vaccine distribution under humanitarian perspectives

This paper is motivated by the occurrence of vaccine nationalism in the setting of pandemics. Certain high-income countries (HICs) aggressively accumulated vaccinations while showing little concern for the vaccination challenges faced by low- and middle- income countries. This disparity fosters the proliferation and mutation of viruses, thus risking the global population’s health and welfare. Hence, we create a data-driven framework to tackle this humanitarian problem by facilitating the provision of vaccines. The framework comprises of two models: a network model named multi-strain Susceptible-Vaccinated-Infected-Removed-Susceptible and a vaccine distribution model with equitable constraints. The latter also encompasses the diverse uncertainty associated with vaccination hesitancy in different countries, in order to avoid potential wastage of resources. The vaccine distribution from our framework is based on greedy thought, thus enabling decision-makers to actively engage in the real-time vaccine allocation process. When the suggested framework is applied to the scenario of the COVID-19 pandemic, the simulation results indicate that fair distributions could accelerate the end of the pandemic. Additional scenarios, such as equitable levels and traveling intensity, are also examined in the sensitivity analysis. The progression of the epidemic under vaccine nationalism is moreover simulated to highlight its harmfulness and validate the efficacy of our framework. We demonstrate that the inequitable advantage experienced by HICs is temporary, as HICs are bound to suffer from virus variants in due course when vaccinations become less efficacious against them. • Our vaccine distribution framework is based on greedy ideas to address the inequity caused by vaccine nationalism. • The suggested framework addresses vaccine hesitancy. • We demonstrate the worldwide benefits of equitable vaccine distribution. • We present two simulation setups to demonstrate the potential effects of vaccine nationalism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Operational Research
Published
2025-05-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2025.05.007
Citations
1
Primary Topic
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A decision-making framework for supporting an equitable global vaccine distribution under humanitarian perspectives

Musen Kingsley Li, Zhen Li, Junyang Cai, Jian Zhou et al.
1 citations
European Journal of Operational Research
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
1.37
article

A decision-making framework for supporting an equitable global vaccine distribution under humanitarian perspectives

Musen Kingsley Li, Zhen Li, Junyang Cai, Jian Zhou, Athanasios A. Pantelous
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper is motivated by the occurrence of vaccine nationalism in the setting of pandemics. Certain high-income countries (HICs) aggressively accumulated vaccinations while showing little concern for the vaccination challenges faced by low- and middle- income countries. This disparity fosters the proliferation and mutation of viruses, thus risking the global population’s health and welfare. Hence, we create a data-driven framework to tackle this humanitarian problem by facilitating the provision of vaccines. The framework comprises of two models: a network model named multi-strain Susceptible-Vaccinated-Infected-Removed-Susceptible and a vaccine distribution model with equitable constraints. The latter also encompasses the diverse uncertainty associated with vaccination hesitancy in different countries, in order to avoid potential wastage of resources. The vaccine distribution from our framework is based on greedy thought, thus enabling decision-makers to actively engage in the real-time vaccine allocation process. When the suggested framework is applied to the scenario of the COVID-19 pandemic, the simulation results indicate that fair distributions could accelerate the end of the pandemic. Additional scenarios, such as equitable levels and traveling intensity, are also examined in the sensitivity analysis. The progression of the epidemic under vaccine nationalism is moreover simulated to highlight its harmfulness and validate the efficacy of our framework. We demonstrate that the inequitable advantage experienced by HICs is temporary, as HICs are bound to suffer from virus variants in due course when vaccinations become less efficacious against them. • Our vaccine distribution framework is based on greedy ideas to address the inequity caused by vaccine nationalism. • The suggested framework addresses vaccine hesitancy. • We demonstrate the worldwide benefits of equitable vaccine distribution. • We present two simulation setups to demonstrate the potential effects of vaccine nationalism.

European Journal of Operational ResearchVol. 327(2)
University of Bahrain (BH), Shanghai University (CN), Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL), Monash University (AU), Bahrain Polytechnic (BH)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
1.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.