The Impact of Two-Sided Contracts for Difference on Debt Sizing for Offshore Wind Farms

Two-sided Contracts for Difference (CfD) are a remuneration mechanism that stabilizes revenues and leads to better financing conditions for offshore wind farms. Despite the EU Commission’s efforts to make two-sided CfDs a mandatory remuneration scheme, many leading offshore wind markets in Europe still apply one-sided CfDs, which, combined with competitive auctions, often result in zero bids and merchant risk exposure. We contribute to the debate on the two-sided CfD effect on financing by quantifying their impact on debt size. Our approach combines a stochastic power price and wind-power feed-in model with cash flow liquidity management in a project financing setting. We show that offshore wind farms with two-sided CfDs experience less financial distress, increasing debt size between 15 and 27 percentage points compared to a project with merchant revenues. The leverage increase could save consumers between 12 and 19 EUR/MWh in electricity generation costs. This emphasizes the importance of continuing revenue stabilization measures to ensure a cost-effective mobilization of investments for financing Europe’s energy transition. JEL Classification: G32, G38, Q48, Q42

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Energy Journal
Published
2025-05-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01956574251331942
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Capital Investment and Risk Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.62
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Two-Sided Contracts for Difference on Debt Sizing for Offshore Wind Farms

Mak Đukan, Lena Kitzing, Dogan Keles
3 citations
The Energy Journal
Capital Investment and Risk Analysis
6.62
article

The Impact of Two-Sided Contracts for Difference on Debt Sizing for Offshore Wind Farms

Mak Đukan, Lena Kitzing, Dogan Keles
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Two-sided Contracts for Difference (CfD) are a remuneration mechanism that stabilizes revenues and leads to better financing conditions for offshore wind farms. Despite the EU Commission’s efforts to make two-sided CfDs a mandatory remuneration scheme, many leading offshore wind markets in Europe still apply one-sided CfDs, which, combined with competitive auctions, often result in zero bids and merchant risk exposure. We contribute to the debate on the two-sided CfD effect on financing by quantifying their impact on debt size. Our approach combines a stochastic power price and wind-power feed-in model with cash flow liquidity management in a project financing setting. We show that offshore wind farms with two-sided CfDs experience less financial distress, increasing debt size between 15 and 27 percentage points compared to a project with merchant revenues. The leverage increase could save consumers between 12 and 19 EUR/MWh in electricity generation costs. This emphasizes the importance of continuing revenue stabilization measures to ensure a cost-effective mobilization of investments for financing Europe’s energy transition. JEL Classification: G32, G38, Q48, Q42

The Energy JournalVol. 46(5)
ETH Zurich (CH), Technical University of Denmark (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Capital Investment and Risk Analysis
6.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Impact of Two-Sided Contracts for Difference on Debt Sizing for Offshore Wind Farms — Mak Đukan, Lena Kitzing, et al. · The Energy Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS