On the use of Participatory System Dynamics Modelling for WEF Nexus management: Hints from two case studies in the Mediterranean region

The security of natural resources is increasingly threatened by multiple pressures that range from climate change impacts to socio-economic conditions, and requires a coordinated action by several practitioners and policy-makers. The concept of Nexus has therefore gained increasing attention in recent scientific literature, as it aims to achieve natural resources security in a holistic and integrated way; however, it has still been limitedly put into practice. Different sectors can be included in Nexus studies, and in the present work reference is made to a rather innovative combination which includes Water, Food and Ecosystems. The present paper proposes the use of Participatory System Dynamics Modelling (PSDM) techniques for an improved Nexus understanding, analysis and management to support policy- and decision-makers. More specifically, we argue that Stock and Flow Diagrams (SFDs), besides providing an improved understanding of the complex interactions and interdependencies in Nexus systems, can also help evaluate multiple policies and solutions for Nexus management based on the use of Sensitivity Analysis and on a what-if Scenario Analysis. In this process, the involvement of stakeholders throughout the modelling phases (from model structure building to scenario selection and analysis) guarantees the inclusion of local knowledge as well as the relevance and ownership of results. Reference is made to the experience in a couple of case studies, namely the Pinios River Basin and the Greater Chania Area (both in Greece but characterized by socio-environmental conditions typical of the whole Mediterranean Area), where Nexus management is central to guaranteeing a sustainable future. • An innovative approach for Nexus analysis based on System Dynamics is proposed. • Stock and Flow Diagrams are used for Nexus understanding and scenario analysis. • The long-term impacts of different policies and strategies are comparatively assessed. • Stakeholders are actively involved throughout modelling development and analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Impact Assessment Review
Published
2025-05-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108012
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the use of Participatory System Dynamics Modelling for WEF Nexus management: Hints from two case studies in the Mediterranean region

Virginia Rosa Coletta, Anna Chatzi, Alessandro Pagano, Maria Α. Lilli et al.
2 citations
Environmental Impact Assessment Review
Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
1.63
article

On the use of Participatory System Dynamics Modelling for WEF Nexus management: Hints from two case studies in the Mediterranean region

Virginia Rosa Coletta, Anna Chatzi, Alessandro Pagano, Maria Α. Lilli, Vassilios Pisinaras, Konstantinos Babakos, Dimitrios Malamataris, Νikolaos P. Nikolaidis, Andreas Panagopoulos, Ivan Portoghese, Raffaele Giordano
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The security of natural resources is increasingly threatened by multiple pressures that range from climate change impacts to socio-economic conditions, and requires a coordinated action by several practitioners and policy-makers. The concept of Nexus has therefore gained increasing attention in recent scientific literature, as it aims to achieve natural resources security in a holistic and integrated way; however, it has still been limitedly put into practice. Different sectors can be included in Nexus studies, and in the present work reference is made to a rather innovative combination which includes Water, Food and Ecosystems. The present paper proposes the use of Participatory System Dynamics Modelling (PSDM) techniques for an improved Nexus understanding, analysis and management to support policy- and decision-makers. More specifically, we argue that Stock and Flow Diagrams (SFDs), besides providing an improved understanding of the complex interactions and interdependencies in Nexus systems, can also help evaluate multiple policies and solutions for Nexus management based on the use of Sensitivity Analysis and on a what-if Scenario Analysis. In this process, the involvement of stakeholders throughout the modelling phases (from model structure building to scenario selection and analysis) guarantees the inclusion of local knowledge as well as the relevance and ownership of results. Reference is made to the experience in a couple of case studies, namely the Pinios River Basin and the Greater Chania Area (both in Greece but characterized by socio-environmental conditions typical of the whole Mediterranean Area), where Nexus management is central to guaranteeing a sustainable future. • An innovative approach for Nexus analysis based on System Dynamics is proposed. • Stock and Flow Diagrams are used for Nexus understanding and scenario analysis. • The long-term impacts of different policies and strategies are comparatively assessed. • Stakeholders are actively involved throughout modelling development and analysis.

Environmental Impact Assessment ReviewVol. 115
Agricultural Research Organization (IL), Institute for Research on Population and Social Policies (IT), Technical University of Crete (GR), Polytechnic University of Bari (IT)
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
1.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.