Comparative Study of Different Drugs in Reducing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Laparoscopic Surgeries

Background: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are common and distressing complications following laparoscopic surgeries, affecting patient satisfaction, recovery, and healthcare costs. Despite the availability of several antiemetic agents, optimal prophylactic strategies remain under debate due to inconsistent comparative efficacy and a lack of consensus in existing literature. Objective: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of dexmedetomidine, dexamethasone, and ondansetron in reducing the incidence and severity of PONV among patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery, hypothesizing that dexmedetomidine would demonstrate superior prophylactic benefit. Methods: In this double-blind, randomized controlled trial, 150 adult patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic procedures at a tertiary care center were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive dexmedetomidine (0.5 µg/kg), dexamethasone (8 mg), or ondansetron (4 mg) intravenously 30 minutes before the end of surgery. Eligible participants were aged 18–70 years with ASA physical status I–III; exclusions included pregnancy, breastfeeding, and age outside the specified range. PONV incidence within 24 hours was assessed using a standardized questionnaire. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 27, employing chi-square and t-tests to evaluate group differences. The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, with informed consent obtained from all participants. Results: Dexmedetomidine significantly reduced the incidence of PONV (16%, n = 8/50) compared to dexamethasone (32%, n = 16/50) and ondansetron (40%, n = 20/50), with group differences reaching statistical significance (χ², p < 0.05). Subjective effectiveness ratings showed variation among groups, but objective clinical outcomes consistently favored dexmedetomidine. No severe adverse events were reported in any group. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine was superior to dexamethasone and ondansetron in preventing PONV in laparoscopic surgery, suggesting its potential for routine prophylactic use to enhance recovery, reduce postoperative complications, and improve patient satisfaction. Broader adoption in clinical practice may lead to better perioperative outcomes and resource utilization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Health Wellness and Community Research
Published
2025-05-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61919/2sdcsg44
Primary Topic
Nausea and vomiting management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study of Different Drugs in Reducing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Laparoscopic Surgeries

Maliha Ahmad, Muhammad Umair Ahmad, Nimra, Waleed Ahmad et al.
Journal of Health Wellness and Community Research
Nausea and vomiting management
article

Comparative Study of Different Drugs in Reducing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Laparoscopic Surgeries

Maliha Ahmad, Muhammad Umair Ahmad, Nimra, Waleed Ahmad, Areeba
article en

Abstract

Background: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are common and distressing complications following laparoscopic surgeries, affecting patient satisfaction, recovery, and healthcare costs. Despite the availability of several antiemetic agents, optimal prophylactic strategies remain under debate due to inconsistent comparative efficacy and a lack of consensus in existing literature. Objective: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of dexmedetomidine, dexamethasone, and ondansetron in reducing the incidence and severity of PONV among patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery, hypothesizing that dexmedetomidine would demonstrate superior prophylactic benefit. Methods: In this double-blind, randomized controlled trial, 150 adult patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic procedures at a tertiary care center were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive dexmedetomidine (0.5 µg/kg), dexamethasone (8 mg), or ondansetron (4 mg) intravenously 30 minutes before the end of surgery. Eligible participants were aged 18–70 years with ASA physical status I–III; exclusions included pregnancy, breastfeeding, and age outside the specified range. PONV incidence within 24 hours was assessed using a standardized questionnaire. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 27, employing chi-square and t-tests to evaluate group differences. The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, with informed consent obtained from all participants. Results: Dexmedetomidine significantly reduced the incidence of PONV (16%, n = 8/50) compared to dexamethasone (32%, n = 16/50) and ondansetron (40%, n = 20/50), with group differences reaching statistical significance (χ², p < 0.05). Subjective effectiveness ratings showed variation among groups, but objective clinical outcomes consistently favored dexmedetomidine. No severe adverse events were reported in any group. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine was superior to dexamethasone and ondansetron in preventing PONV in laparoscopic surgery, suggesting its potential for routine prophylactic use to enhance recovery, reduce postoperative complications, and improve patient satisfaction. Broader adoption in clinical practice may lead to better perioperative outcomes and resource utilization.

Journal of Health Wellness and Community Research
University of Health and Allied Sciences (GH), Superior University (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Nausea and vomiting management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.