Electron capture and ionisation in intermediate-energy C$$^{6+}-$$He collisions: Integrated cross sections

Abstract Integrated cross sections for total and state-selective electron capture, and ionisation in C $$^{6+}-$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>6</mml:mn> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> He collisions are calculated using the two-centre four-body wave-packet convergent close-coupling method for projectile energies ranging from 2 keV/u to 3 MeV/u. The two-electron target structure accounts for electron-electron correlation effects, as well as electron exchange in the rearrangement C $$^{5+}-$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>5</mml:mn> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> He $$^{+}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> </mml:mmultiscripts> </mml:math> channels, which become important at low and intermediate energies. Also used for comparison is an alternative approach that reduces the He target to an effective one-electron system. For electron capture, both methods display good agreement with experiments at high impact energies. For low impact energies the two-electron method performs well, however, the effective single-electron model overestimates available experimental data. Generally good agreement with experiment is found for ionisation cross sections for projectile energies greater than 100 keV/u with both methods. The effective single-electron method is extended down to 10 keV/u, however it overestimates low-energy experiments. It is concluded that the two-electron target description is necessary to correctly model electron capture in the entire range of incident collision energies considered in this work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The European Physical Journal D
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/s10053-025-01008-8
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Atomic and Molecular Physics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.25

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Electron capture and ionisation in intermediate-energy C$$^{6+}-$$He collisions: Integrated cross sections

N. W. Antonio, K. H. Spicer, Sh. U. Alladustov, A. S. Kadyrov et al.
1 citations
The European Physical Journal D
Atomic and Molecular Physics
1.25
article

Electron capture and ionisation in intermediate-energy C$$^{6+}-$$He collisions: Integrated cross sections

N. W. Antonio, K. H. Spicer, Sh. U. Alladustov, A. S. Kadyrov, K. Schrick
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Integrated cross sections for total and state-selective electron capture, and ionisation in C $$^{6+}-$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>6</mml:mn> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> He collisions are calculated using the two-centre four-body wave-packet convergent close-coupling method for projectile energies ranging from 2 keV/u to 3 MeV/u. The two-electron target structure accounts for electron-electron correlation effects, as well as electron exchange in the rearrangement C $$^{5+}-$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>5</mml:mn> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> He $$^{+}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> </mml:mmultiscripts> </mml:math> channels, which become important at low and intermediate energies. Also used for comparison is an alternative approach that reduces the He target to an effective one-electron system. For electron capture, both methods display good agreement with experiments at high impact energies. For low impact energies the two-electron method performs well, however, the effective single-electron model overestimates available experimental data. Generally good agreement with experiment is found for ionisation cross sections for projectile energies greater than 100 keV/u with both methods. The effective single-electron method is extended down to 10 keV/u, however it overestimates low-energy experiments. It is concluded that the two-electron target description is necessary to correctly model electron capture in the entire range of incident collision energies considered in this work.

The European Physical Journal DVol. 79(5)
Curtin University (AU), Institute of Nuclear Physics (UZ), Tashkent State University of Economics (UZ)
Australian Government
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Atomic and Molecular Physics
1.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.