Public perceptions and practices on air quality and respiratory health: insights from a cross-sectional study in Saudi Arabia

This study aimed to assess public perceptions and practices regarding air quality and its impact on respiratory health in Saudi Arabia. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 539 participants, selected through stratified random sampling across urban, semi-urban, and rural areas. Data were collected via an online questionnaire and analyzed using descriptive statistics, <i>t</i>-tests, and ANOVA. Findings indicated that 63.2% (<i>n</i> = 341) of participants occasionally checked air quality reports, with moderate confidence in interpreting them (52.5%, <i>n</i> = 283). Awareness of the health impacts of air pollution was higher in urban areas, while rural participants showed less concern and lower awareness (<i>P</i> < .0001). Younger participants (18-30 years) had the highest concern about air pollution (mean: 3.39), whereas older participants demonstrated lower awareness of associated health risks (<i>P</i> < .0001). The study found no significant gender differences in perceptions (<i>P</i> > .05). Despite moderate concern about air pollution, participants perceived a low impact on their quality of life (mean: 2.85). The study underscores the importance of localized public health strategies to address air quality concerns and mitigate respiratory health risks in Saudi Arabia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medicine and Life
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25122/jml-2024-0385
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Air Quality and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public perceptions and practices on air quality and respiratory health: insights from a cross-sectional study in Saudi Arabia

Husain A. Ghaffar Alsharifa, Turki M Alanzi, Reema Naeel Taha, Nouf Alanzi et al.
1 citations
Journal of Medicine and Life
Air Quality and Health Impacts
1.20
article

Public perceptions and practices on air quality and respiratory health: insights from a cross-sectional study in Saudi Arabia

Husain A. Ghaffar Alsharifa, Turki M Alanzi, Reema Naeel Taha, Nouf Alanzi, Mohammed Aloufi, Joud Alshangiti, Norah Aljarbooa, Faris AlSalem, Rahaf Sawan, Bushra Albalawi, Gumashah Ababtain, Mirnan Toonsi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study aimed to assess public perceptions and practices regarding air quality and its impact on respiratory health in Saudi Arabia. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 539 participants, selected through stratified random sampling across urban, semi-urban, and rural areas. Data were collected via an online questionnaire and analyzed using descriptive statistics, <i>t</i>-tests, and ANOVA. Findings indicated that 63.2% (<i>n</i> = 341) of participants occasionally checked air quality reports, with moderate confidence in interpreting them (52.5%, <i>n</i> = 283). Awareness of the health impacts of air pollution was higher in urban areas, while rural participants showed less concern and lower awareness (<i>P</i> < .0001). Younger participants (18-30 years) had the highest concern about air pollution (mean: 3.39), whereas older participants demonstrated lower awareness of associated health risks (<i>P</i> < .0001). The study found no significant gender differences in perceptions (<i>P</i> > .05). Despite moderate concern about air pollution, participants perceived a low impact on their quality of life (mean: 2.85). The study underscores the importance of localized public health strategies to address air quality concerns and mitigate respiratory health risks in Saudi Arabia.

Journal of Medicine and LifeVol. 18(4)
Qassim University (SA), Umm al-Qura University (SA), Jouf University (SA), King Saud University (SA), Arabian Gulf University (BH), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University (SA), King Khalid University (SA), Jazan University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Air Quality and Health Impacts
1.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.