The hidden figure of Isaiah 51:16 and the preexistence of the son of man in the Parables of Enoch

Scholars have long puzzled over the Parables of Enoch’s depiction of the figure identified as the Son of Man as existing before creation. Previous proposals have suggested that this idea derives from the influence of the depiction of wisdom in Prov 8:22–31, the king in Ps 72:17, or the Servant of the Lord in Isa 49:1–2. In this article, I discuss these three proposals, rejecting the first entirely and suggesting that the latter two have some validity but fall short of explaining the key reason behind the Son of Man’s pre-creation existence. I then propose that the most important scriptural source for this idea is Isa 51:16, which has a syntactical ambiguity that allows it to be read as describing a figure hidden by God before the creation of the world. This verse shares significant parallels with Isa 49:2, and these texts were combined in 1 En. 48:6 and 62:7 in order to depict the Son of Man as a preexistent figure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha
Published
2025-05-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09518207251340011
Primary Topic
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The hidden figure of Isaiah 51:16 and the preexistence of the son of man in the Parables of Enoch

J. Andrew Cowan
Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
article

The hidden figure of Isaiah 51:16 and the preexistence of the son of man in the Parables of Enoch

J. Andrew Cowan
article en

Abstract

Scholars have long puzzled over the Parables of Enoch’s depiction of the figure identified as the Son of Man as existing before creation. Previous proposals have suggested that this idea derives from the influence of the depiction of wisdom in Prov 8:22–31, the king in Ps 72:17, or the Servant of the Lord in Isa 49:1–2. In this article, I discuss these three proposals, rejecting the first entirely and suggesting that the latter two have some validity but fall short of explaining the key reason behind the Son of Man’s pre-creation existence. I then propose that the most important scriptural source for this idea is Isa 51:16, which has a syntactical ambiguity that allows it to be read as describing a figure hidden by God before the creation of the world. This verse shares significant parallels with Isa 49:2, and these texts were combined in 1 En. 48:6 and 62:7 in order to depict the Son of Man as a preexistent figure.

Journal for the Study of the PseudepigraphaVol. 35(3)
University of Göttingen (DE)
Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.