Beneath the buzz: Quantifying nest locations and densities of ground‐nesting wild bees (Hymenoptera: Anthophila)

Abstract Wild bees (Hymenoptera: Anthophila) are important pollinators and essential for maintaining ecosystem health. The majority of bee species are ground‐nesting, and all bees spend most of their lifetime inside the nest. Still, most studies and monitoring schemes assess wild bees during flower visitation, allowing no conclusion about their nest sites. Methods for locating and assessing the ground nests of bees are currently limited, hindering scientific progress and conservation efforts. To evaluate and improve methods for locating and assessing ground nests, we combined information from a literature review and our own empirical studies. Methods ranging from established field methods (visual nest observations and emergence traps) to new technological approaches (marking and tracking individuals) are compared in terms of success in catching nesting bees and identifying nest locations, time effort required to implement the methods, and limitations. We provide guidelines and recommendations on the use of the different methods depending on the data requirements and study locations. We also present a novel emergence trap design and two newly developed marking methods, using a radioactive tracer substance and a retroreflective pigment, and show that these methods can be used to successfully locate and assess ground‐nesting habitats of bees. With this work, we address gaps in current research methods and aim to enhance the efficiency of field research that explicitly targets ground‐nesting bees and their nest sites in various environments. By providing a comprehensive overview for researchers and practitioners, we demonstrate how to improve knowledge about the ecology and life history of ground‐nesting bees and thus support efforts for their conservation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Published
2025-05-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.70062
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beneath the buzz: Quantifying nest locations and densities of ground‐nesting wild bees (Hymenoptera: Anthophila)

Michael Mix, Felix Fornoff, Michael P. D. Garratt, Anne‐Christine Mupepele et al.
4 citations
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Plant and animal studies
12.11
article

Beneath the buzz: Quantifying nest locations and densities of ground‐nesting wild bees (Hymenoptera: Anthophila)

Michael Mix, Felix Fornoff, Michael P. D. Garratt, Anne‐Christine Mupepele, Alexandra‐Maria Klein, Christopher Hellerich
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Wild bees (Hymenoptera: Anthophila) are important pollinators and essential for maintaining ecosystem health. The majority of bee species are ground‐nesting, and all bees spend most of their lifetime inside the nest. Still, most studies and monitoring schemes assess wild bees during flower visitation, allowing no conclusion about their nest sites. Methods for locating and assessing the ground nests of bees are currently limited, hindering scientific progress and conservation efforts. To evaluate and improve methods for locating and assessing ground nests, we combined information from a literature review and our own empirical studies. Methods ranging from established field methods (visual nest observations and emergence traps) to new technological approaches (marking and tracking individuals) are compared in terms of success in catching nesting bees and identifying nest locations, time effort required to implement the methods, and limitations. We provide guidelines and recommendations on the use of the different methods depending on the data requirements and study locations. We also present a novel emergence trap design and two newly developed marking methods, using a radioactive tracer substance and a retroreflective pigment, and show that these methods can be used to successfully locate and assess ground‐nesting habitats of bees. With this work, we address gaps in current research methods and aim to enhance the efficiency of field research that explicitly targets ground‐nesting bees and their nest sites in various environments. By providing a comprehensive overview for researchers and practitioners, we demonstrate how to improve knowledge about the ecology and life history of ground‐nesting bees and thus support efforts for their conservation.

Methods in Ecology and EvolutionVol. 16(7)
University of Freiburg (DE), Philipps University of Marburg (DE), University Medical Center Freiburg (DE), University of Reading (GB)
Ministry for the Environment, New Zealand
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Plant and animal studies
12.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.