“Non-Markovian” and “directional” errors inhibit scientific self-correction and can lead fields of study astray: an illustration using gardening and obesity-related outcomes
Herein we coin the terms non-Markovian error and biased Markovian error to describe categories of scientific errors for which general progress within a field of study may be unlikely to result in scientific self-correction. We provide examples of such errors and show their impact on studies about gardening and obesity.
Authors
- Sarah E. Deemer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4758-6796)
- Jon D. Agley (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2345-8850)
- David J. Allison (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8101-4265)
Institutions
- University of North Texas (US)
- Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Published
- 2025-05-24
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-025-02590-6
- Primary Topic
- Climate Change and Health Impacts
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00