Computational mechanisms underlying multi-step planning deficits in methamphetamine use disorder

Current theories suggest individuals with methamphetamine use disorder (iMUDs) have difficulty considering long-term outcomes in decision-making, which could contribute to risk of relapse. Aversive interoceptive states (e.g., stress, withdrawal) are also known to increase this risk. The present study analyzed computational mechanisms of planning in iMUDs, and examined the potential impact of an aversive interoceptive state induction. A group of 40 iMUDs and 49 healthy participants completed two runs of a multi-step planning task, with and without an anxiogenic breathing resistance manipulation. Computational modeling revealed that iMUDs had selective difficulty identifying the best overall plan when this required enduring negative short-term outcomes - a mechanism referred to as aversive pruning. Increases in reported craving before and after the induction also predicted greater aversive pruning in iMUDs. These results highlight aversive pruning deficits as a novel mechanism that could promote poor choice in recovering iMUDs and create vulnerability to relapse.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Translational Psychiatry
Published
2025-05-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-025-03390-8
Primary Topic
Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Computational mechanisms underlying multi-step planning deficits in methamphetamine use disorder

Ryan Smith, Sahib S. Khalsa, Samuel Taylor, Marishka Mehta et al.
Translational Psychiatry
Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
article

Computational mechanisms underlying multi-step planning deficits in methamphetamine use disorder

Ryan Smith, Sahib S. Khalsa, Samuel Taylor, Marishka Mehta, Jennifer L. Stewart, Quentin J. M. Huys, Anne E. Chuning, Claire A. Lavalley, Martin P. Paulus
article en

Abstract

Current theories suggest individuals with methamphetamine use disorder (iMUDs) have difficulty considering long-term outcomes in decision-making, which could contribute to risk of relapse. Aversive interoceptive states (e.g., stress, withdrawal) are also known to increase this risk. The present study analyzed computational mechanisms of planning in iMUDs, and examined the potential impact of an aversive interoceptive state induction. A group of 40 iMUDs and 49 healthy participants completed two runs of a multi-step planning task, with and without an anxiogenic breathing resistance manipulation. Computational modeling revealed that iMUDs had selective difficulty identifying the best overall plan when this required enduring negative short-term outcomes - a mechanism referred to as aversive pruning. Increases in reported craving before and after the induction also predicted greater aversive pruning in iMUDs. These results highlight aversive pruning deficits as a novel mechanism that could promote poor choice in recovering iMUDs and create vulnerability to relapse.

Translational PsychiatryVol. 15(1)
Max Planck Institute for Biology of Ageing (DE), Laureate Institute for Brain Research (US), University College London (GB), University of Tulsa (US)
National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institute of General Medical Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.