A Systematic Literature Review of Reading Instruction for Students With Complex Communication Needs

Most approaches for teaching reading involve students reading aloud and receiving feedback. These approaches are not feasible for nonspeaking students, and teachers need alternative strategies that do not require speech. To provide guidance about effective strategies, we conducted a systematic review of 51 experimental studies within 36 journal articles that evaluated reading interventions for students with significant disabilities and complex communication needs. The most common intervention components included task analytic instruction, a gradual release model (i.e., model-lead-test), systematic prompting, and incremental rehearsal. Positive effects were most often reported for decoding outcomes (92%; n = 11), phoneme segmentation (87%, n = 2), and sight words (92%, n = 11). Reading comprehension was only targeted in one study, and fluency was not targeted at all. These findings provide insight into targeting some components of reading, but further research is needed that allows teachers to provide more comprehensive reading instruction for this population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities
Published
2025-05-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15407969251333963
Primary Topic
Disability Education and Employment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Systematic Literature Review of Reading Instruction for Students With Complex Communication Needs

Matthew E. Brock, Genevieve Hurlburt, Sarah E. Hudler
Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities
Disability Education and Employment
article

A Systematic Literature Review of Reading Instruction for Students With Complex Communication Needs

Matthew E. Brock, Genevieve Hurlburt, Sarah E. Hudler
article en

Abstract

Most approaches for teaching reading involve students reading aloud and receiving feedback. These approaches are not feasible for nonspeaking students, and teachers need alternative strategies that do not require speech. To provide guidance about effective strategies, we conducted a systematic review of 51 experimental studies within 36 journal articles that evaluated reading interventions for students with significant disabilities and complex communication needs. The most common intervention components included task analytic instruction, a gradual release model (i.e., model-lead-test), systematic prompting, and incremental rehearsal. Positive effects were most often reported for decoding outcomes (92%; n = 11), phoneme segmentation (87%, n = 2), and sight words (92%, n = 11). Reading comprehension was only targeted in one study, and fluency was not targeted at all. These findings provide insight into targeting some components of reading, but further research is needed that allows teachers to provide more comprehensive reading instruction for this population.

Research and Practice for Persons with Severe DisabilitiesVol. 50(4)
The Ohio State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Disability Education and Employment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.