Reading the Readers Mind through Eye Tracking: Can AI Generated Texts Match Human Authors?

While Generative AI models like Large Language Models (LLMs)<br/>are capable of generating extensive text, their efficacy in producing<br/>readable content for human participants in experimental settings<br/>remains to be evaluated. Further, eye-tracking technology is increas-<br/>ingly utilized to study cognition and behavior, yet its application to<br/>readers’ cognitive processes when exposed to AI-generated versus<br/>human-authored texts remains unexplored. This study investigates<br/>how text generated by LLMs influences reading by analyzing gaze<br/>patterns.<br/>The study collects gaze data from 13 participants as they read AI-<br/>generated and human-authored passages. A comparative analysis is<br/>conducted within subjects to assess gaze patterns between authors<br/>and between text types based on the robust two-means clustering<br/>(I2MC) algorithm to identify fixations. In addition, pupil dilation<br/>and reading speed were examined.<br/>Our findings reveal significant differences in fixation character-<br/>istics not only between authors but also between AI-generated and<br/>human-authored texts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3715669.3726846
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reading the Readers Mind through Eye Tracking: Can AI Generated Texts Match Human Authors?

Sofie Beier, Chaudhary Muhammad Aqdus Ilyas, Per Bækgaard, Bart Cooreman et al.
AI in Service Interactions
article

Reading the Readers Mind through Eye Tracking: Can AI Generated Texts Match Human Authors?

Sofie Beier, Chaudhary Muhammad Aqdus Ilyas, Per Bækgaard, Bart Cooreman, Ashkan Tashk, S. S. M. Noor
article en

Abstract

While Generative AI models like Large Language Models (LLMs)<br/>are capable of generating extensive text, their efficacy in producing<br/>readable content for human participants in experimental settings<br/>remains to be evaluated. Further, eye-tracking technology is increas-<br/>ingly utilized to study cognition and behavior, yet its application to<br/>readers’ cognitive processes when exposed to AI-generated versus<br/>human-authored texts remains unexplored. This study investigates<br/>how text generated by LLMs influences reading by analyzing gaze<br/>patterns.<br/>The study collects gaze data from 13 participants as they read AI-<br/>generated and human-authored passages. A comparative analysis is<br/>conducted within subjects to assess gaze patterns between authors<br/>and between text types based on the robust two-means clustering<br/>(I2MC) algorithm to identify fixations. In addition, pupil dilation<br/>and reading speed were examined.<br/>Our findings reveal significant differences in fixation character-<br/>istics not only between authors but also between AI-generated and<br/>human-authored texts.

Technical University of Denmark (DK), Schools of Visual Arts, The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts (DK)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.