Energy-Aware Benchmarking of Wearable Eye Trackers

The number of devices embedding eye tracking (ET) capabilities, such as portable webcam-based consumer devices and wearable ones, such as headsets and smart eyeglasses, is rapidly increasing, making this technology truly pervasive. Despite the large number of papers and reviews discussing data quality and benchmarking of trackers, none of them is addressing the trade-off between power consumption, speed and accuracy. Power dissipation is typically dominated by signal processing to extract gaze information from sensors embedded in the glasses. This compromise is crucial for smart glasses, powered by miniature batteries, offering a typical power budget of a few tens of mW for ET. Here we propose a simple benchmarking flow for wearable trackers, focused on power consumption, as well as accuracy, precision and sampling rate, and based on three complementary test setups. We report the preliminary results of the experimental characterization of 6 commercial trackers in the first static setup and we show a comparison of their performance based on a single figure of merit.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3715669.3727348
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Energy-Aware Benchmarking of Wearable Eye Trackers

Giulio Marano, Marco Carminati, Daniele M. Crafa, Andrew T. Duchowski et al.
2 citations
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
3.87
article

Energy-Aware Benchmarking of Wearable Eye Trackers

Giulio Marano, Marco Carminati, Daniele M. Crafa, Andrew T. Duchowski, Tommaso Ongarello, Andrea Aspesi, Alberto Pettenella, Filippo Melloni, Daniele Bani, Luca Merigo
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The number of devices embedding eye tracking (ET) capabilities, such as portable webcam-based consumer devices and wearable ones, such as headsets and smart eyeglasses, is rapidly increasing, making this technology truly pervasive. Despite the large number of papers and reviews discussing data quality and benchmarking of trackers, none of them is addressing the trade-off between power consumption, speed and accuracy. Power dissipation is typically dominated by signal processing to extract gaze information from sensors embedded in the glasses. This compromise is crucial for smart glasses, powered by miniature batteries, offering a typical power budget of a few tens of mW for ET. Here we propose a simple benchmarking flow for wearable trackers, focused on power consumption, as well as accuracy, precision and sampling rate, and based on three complementary test setups. We report the preliminary results of the experimental characterization of 6 commercial trackers in the first static setup and we show a comparison of their performance based on a single figure of merit.

Luxottica (Italy) (IT), Clemson University (US), Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
3.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.