The termination of a ‘permanent romantic relationship’ and the right to maintenance pendente lite: EW v VH & Women’s Legal Centre Trust

Unmarried permanent life partnerships have become a common phenomenon in South Africa. In EW v VH 2023 (4) SA 123 (WCC), the Western Cape High Court had to deal with an application for maintenance pendente lite and a contribution towards costs following the termination of a ‘permanent romantic relationship’. Part of the application was a prayer for developing the common law to recognise a claim for ongoing maintenance for life partners. An interim and constitutionally sound remedy for such couples upon the breakdown of their relationship needed to be found in the interests of justice. We examine the court’s constitutional duty to promote the spirit, purport and objects of the Bill of Rights when developing the common law and conclude that the lack of maintenance pendente lite protection for life partners undoubtedly constitutes unfair discrimination against a traditionally disadvantaged group: unmarried, cohabiting women.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
South African Law Journal
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47348/salj/v142/i2a3
Primary Topic
Legal Issues in South Africa
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The termination of a ‘permanent romantic relationship’ and the right to maintenance pendente lite: EW v VH & Women’s Legal Centre Trust

Belinda van Heerden, Brigitte Clark
South African Law Journal
Legal Issues in South Africa
article

The termination of a ‘permanent romantic relationship’ and the right to maintenance pendente lite: EW v VH & Women’s Legal Centre Trust

Belinda van Heerden, Brigitte Clark
article en

Abstract

Unmarried permanent life partnerships have become a common phenomenon in South Africa. In EW v VH 2023 (4) SA 123 (WCC), the Western Cape High Court had to deal with an application for maintenance pendente lite and a contribution towards costs following the termination of a ‘permanent romantic relationship’. Part of the application was a prayer for developing the common law to recognise a claim for ongoing maintenance for life partners. An interim and constitutionally sound remedy for such couples upon the breakdown of their relationship needed to be found in the interests of justice. We examine the court’s constitutional duty to promote the spirit, purport and objects of the Bill of Rights when developing the common law and conclude that the lack of maintenance pendente lite protection for life partners undoubtedly constitutes unfair discrimination against a traditionally disadvantaged group: unmarried, cohabiting women.

South African Law JournalVol. 142(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Legal Issues in South Africa
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The termination of a ‘permanent romantic relationship’ and the right to maintenance pendente lite: EW v VH & Women’s Legal Centre Trust — Belinda van Heerden, Brigitte Clark · South African Law Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS