Training and learning curves in robotic pancreatic surgery

Robotic pancreatic surgery is complex, and its establishment in an institution require a structured approach to secure optimal short- and long-term outcomes. This article provides a structured training proposition for robotic pancreatic surgery and gives an overview of the learning curves and examines the key takeaways. The preclinical training in robotic pancreatic surgery can be divided into a basic and advanced phase. The basic phase includes virtual reality training, biotissue drills, and specialized training courses. The advanced phase consists of reaching benchmarks for the biotissue drills and completing video-based training. After establishing a dedicated interprofessional surgical team index procedures and first robotic pancreatic cases can be performed under the supervision of a proctor. Three phases of clinical training are proposed: competency, proficiency, and mastery. Competency referring to be able to perform the procedure without supervision in patients without risk factors and with average technical difficulty. Proficiency signifying consistently reaching benchmark- and textbook outcome in patients with risk factors and extended indications. Mastery is achieving benchmark values for morbidity rates even in complex cases requiring vessel or multi-visceral resections and with patients having multiple risk factors. The number of cases to overcome the initial phase of the learning curve vary between 7 and 46 for robotic distal pancreatectomy and 8–100 for robotic partial pancreaticoduodenectomy. Significantly longer learning phases of 60–200 cases are reported to complete all three learning phases. In conclusion the hallmarks for safe and efficient implementation of robotic pancreatic surgery are a dedicated team, structured training program and stepwise patient selection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Surgical Oncology
Published
2025-05-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cson.2025.100081
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Surgical Simulation and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Training and learning curves in robotic pancreatic surgery

Thilo Hackert, Amila Cizmic, Felix Nickel, Faik G. Uzunoǧlu et al.
1 citations
Clinical Surgical Oncology
Surgical Simulation and Training
2.01
article

Training and learning curves in robotic pancreatic surgery

Thilo Hackert, Amila Cizmic, Felix Nickel, Faik G. Uzunoǧlu, Philip C. Müller, Christoph Kuemmerli, Anas Amin Preukschas
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Robotic pancreatic surgery is complex, and its establishment in an institution require a structured approach to secure optimal short- and long-term outcomes. This article provides a structured training proposition for robotic pancreatic surgery and gives an overview of the learning curves and examines the key takeaways. The preclinical training in robotic pancreatic surgery can be divided into a basic and advanced phase. The basic phase includes virtual reality training, biotissue drills, and specialized training courses. The advanced phase consists of reaching benchmarks for the biotissue drills and completing video-based training. After establishing a dedicated interprofessional surgical team index procedures and first robotic pancreatic cases can be performed under the supervision of a proctor. Three phases of clinical training are proposed: competency, proficiency, and mastery. Competency referring to be able to perform the procedure without supervision in patients without risk factors and with average technical difficulty. Proficiency signifying consistently reaching benchmark- and textbook outcome in patients with risk factors and extended indications. Mastery is achieving benchmark values for morbidity rates even in complex cases requiring vessel or multi-visceral resections and with patients having multiple risk factors. The number of cases to overcome the initial phase of the learning curve vary between 7 and 46 for robotic distal pancreatectomy and 8–100 for robotic partial pancreaticoduodenectomy. Significantly longer learning phases of 60–200 cases are reported to complete all three learning phases. In conclusion the hallmarks for safe and efficient implementation of robotic pancreatic surgery are a dedicated team, structured training program and stepwise patient selection.

Clinical Surgical OncologyVol. 4(2)
Universität Hamburg (DE), University Hospital of Basel (CH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Surgical Simulation and Training
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.