The Promise and Perils of NGO‐Supported Science

ABSTRACT Until recently, philosophers of science have largely focused their attention on academic and industry‐funded research, overlooking the contributions of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) to science. Nevertheless, NGO‐supported science is highly significant both from a practical perspective (serving as a source of impactful research that can address the needs of local communities) and a theoretical perspective (serving as a unique institutional context for scientific research that contrasts with more well‐studied institutional contexts). To facilitate further studies of NGO‐supported science, this paper provides an overview of what is currently known about its major strengths and weaknesses, as well as potential strategies for addressing those weaknesses. On the basis of this analysis, the paper shows that studying NGO‐supported science can generate important insights about the institutional structure of science, approaches for managing values in science, strategies for generating impactful research, and instances of “false advertising” in science that need to be carefully addressed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy Compass
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.70043
Primary Topic
Science, Research, and Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Promise and Perils of NGO‐Supported Science

Pedro Bravo de Souza, Kevin C. Elliott
Philosophy Compass
Science, Research, and Medicine
article

The Promise and Perils of NGO‐Supported Science

Pedro Bravo de Souza, Kevin C. Elliott
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Until recently, philosophers of science have largely focused their attention on academic and industry‐funded research, overlooking the contributions of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) to science. Nevertheless, NGO‐supported science is highly significant both from a practical perspective (serving as a source of impactful research that can address the needs of local communities) and a theoretical perspective (serving as a unique institutional context for scientific research that contrasts with more well‐studied institutional contexts). To facilitate further studies of NGO‐supported science, this paper provides an overview of what is currently known about its major strengths and weaknesses, as well as potential strategies for addressing those weaknesses. On the basis of this analysis, the paper shows that studying NGO‐supported science can generate important insights about the institutional structure of science, approaches for managing values in science, strategies for generating impactful research, and instances of “false advertising” in science that need to be carefully addressed.

Philosophy CompassVol. 20(5)
Universidade Federal do ABC (BR), Michigan State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Science, Research, and Medicine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Promise and Perils of NGO‐Supported Science — Pedro Bravo de Souza, Kevin C. Elliott · Philosophy Compass (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS