Framework for classifying chemicals for repeat dose toxicity using NAMs

EPAA's 'NAM Designathon 2023' challenge for human toxicity sought to identify a classification system capable of categorising chemicals based on their bioactivity and bioavailability properties determined using non-animal methodologies (Worth et al. 2025). The proposal is made to classify chemicals into three levels of concern: low concern could be used without restriction, medium concern requiring assessment to establish safe use levels and high concern being candidates requiring risk management (Berggren and Worth in Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 142:105431, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2023.105431 , 2023). We developed a NAMs based classification system for "human systemic toxicity" mainly focussed on repeat dose toxicity, similar to the assessment carried out in classification for 'Specific Target Organ Toxicity-Repeated Exposure' (STOT-RE) based on ECETOC's Tiered Approach integrating three lines of evidence: In silico predictions, In vitro bioavailability and PBK modelling, In vitro bioactivity assays. The first stage employed an in silico approach, covering several toxicity endpoints across various (Q)SAR in silico models to identify indicators of toxicity. Bioavailability was categorised by simulating 14-day plasma C<sub>max</sub> predictions for a standard dose level using three TK models (Firman et al. in Arch Toxicol 96:817-830, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-021-03205-x , 2022). Bioactivity was categorised using a matrix with potency and severity. In vitro data were obtained from ToxCast. Potency makes use of dose response AC50 values. Severity categorisation is based on consideration of the adverse effects associated with the assays. 12 chemicals have been assessed through the framework. Overall, we have demonstrated that the matrix suggested by the EPAA Designathon can be used to categorise chemicals into three different levels of concern but there are areas still to be explored especially for the range of assays used, the framework categorisation being defined, and how such a matrix would fit into a tiered approach, pragmatically, including targeted in vivo studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Toxicology
Published
2025-05-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-025-04069-1
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Framework for classifying chemicals for repeat dose toxicity using NAMs

John E. Doe, Raja S. Settivari, David M. Holland, Sanjeeva J. Wijeyesakere et al.
2 citations
Archives of Toxicology
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
3.01
article

Framework for classifying chemicals for repeat dose toxicity using NAMs

John E. Doe, Raja S. Settivari, David M. Holland, Sanjeeva J. Wijeyesakere, Sue Marty, Pushpa S. Kalra, Varun Giri, P. Botham, Elena Reale, Hye Jin Kang, S. Moors, M. Fuart Gatnik, R. Raeburn, M. Sica, K. Z. Travis, S. León Pérez
article en
2 citations

Abstract

EPAA's 'NAM Designathon 2023' challenge for human toxicity sought to identify a classification system capable of categorising chemicals based on their bioactivity and bioavailability properties determined using non-animal methodologies (Worth et al. 2025). The proposal is made to classify chemicals into three levels of concern: low concern could be used without restriction, medium concern requiring assessment to establish safe use levels and high concern being candidates requiring risk management (Berggren and Worth in Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 142:105431, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2023.105431 , 2023). We developed a NAMs based classification system for "human systemic toxicity" mainly focussed on repeat dose toxicity, similar to the assessment carried out in classification for 'Specific Target Organ Toxicity-Repeated Exposure' (STOT-RE) based on ECETOC's Tiered Approach integrating three lines of evidence: In silico predictions, In vitro bioavailability and PBK modelling, In vitro bioactivity assays. The first stage employed an in silico approach, covering several toxicity endpoints across various (Q)SAR in silico models to identify indicators of toxicity. Bioavailability was categorised by simulating 14-day plasma C<sub>max</sub> predictions for a standard dose level using three TK models (Firman et al. in Arch Toxicol 96:817-830, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-021-03205-x , 2022). Bioactivity was categorised using a matrix with potency and severity. In vitro data were obtained from ToxCast. Potency makes use of dose response AC50 values. Severity categorisation is based on consideration of the adverse effects associated with the assays. 12 chemicals have been assessed through the framework. Overall, we have demonstrated that the matrix suggested by the EPAA Designathon can be used to categorise chemicals into three different levels of concern but there are areas still to be explored especially for the range of assays used, the framework categorisation being defined, and how such a matrix would fit into a tiered approach, pragmatically, including targeted in vivo studies.

Archives of ToxicologyVol. 99(8)
Dow Chemical (India) (IN), Evonik (Germany) (DE), Syngenta (United Kingdom) (GB), European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals (BE), BASF (Germany) (DE), Vodovod-Kanalizacija (Slovenia) (SI), Nestlé (Switzerland) (CH), Corteva (United States) (US), Boehringer Ingelheim (South Korea) (KR), Dow Chemical (United States) (US), Technological Educational Institute of Thessaly (GR), Liverpool John Moores University (GB), Henkel (Germany) (DE), Simulations Plus (United States) (US), Robert Bosch (Germany) (DE), ExxonMobil (United States) (US), LyondellBasell (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
3.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.